rs6048 — F9 Factor IX Malmö
Common missense variant in the X-linked coagulation factor IX gene; the G allele is modestly protective against deep vein thrombosis, though its biological mechanism remains incompletely understood
Details
- Gene
- F9
- Chromosome
- X
- Risk allele
- A
- Clinical
- Protective
- Evidence
- Moderate
Population Frequency
Category
Coagulation & Clotting FactorsSee your personal result for F9
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
Factor IX Malmö — The X-Linked DVT Modifier with an Unknown Mechanism
Coagulation factor IX sits at the centre of the intrinsic pathway of blood clotting. When
activated by factor XIa, it forms the tenase complex with factor VIIIa, which in turn
activates factor X to trigger fibrin clot formation. Severe loss-of-function mutations in F9
cause haemophilia B (Christmas disease). Factor IX Malmö — rs6048, the common p.Thr194Ala
missense variant11 p.Thr194Ala
missense variant
An amino acid change from threonine to alanine at position 194 of the
canonical pre-pro-protein; also reported as Ala148Thr in older literature using mature-protein
numbering that excludes the signal peptide and propeptide —
is a far subtler story: a common polymorphism that modestly shifts clotting risk in the
general population without causing haemophilia.
Because F9 is located on the X chromosome, males carry only one copy (hemizygous), while females can carry zero, one, or two copies of the protective G allele. Genotyping chips typically report hemizygous males as homozygous in the raw data, so a male reported as GG carries exactly one G allele, and a male reported as AA carries one A allele.
The Mechanism
At position 194 in the pre-pro-factor IX sequence, the common A allele encodes threonine;
the protective G allele encodes alanine. This substitution is located in the EGF-1 domain
of the factor IX protein, a region involved in calcium binding and factor VIIIa interaction.
Despite this structurally interesting location, a key finding from the primary association
study is that factor IX antigen levels and factor IX activation peptide levels — markers
of factor IX production and activation — did not differ significantly between AA and GG
carriers22 factor IX antigen levels and factor IX activation peptide levels — markers
of factor IX production and activation — did not differ significantly between AA and GG
carriers
Bezemer et al. 2009 measured both factor IX antigen and FIXa activation peptide
in controls from the LETS (n=191) and MEGA (n=823+484) studies; no significant genotype
effect. This means the mechanism of the G
allele's protective effect is genuinely unknown — it is not simply producing less factor IX
or generating less activated factor IX. Whether the alanine substitution subtly alters
factor IX's interaction with factor VIIIa, phospholipid membranes, or inhibitory proteins
such as antithrombin remains to be determined.
An adjacent intronic variant (rs422187) showed similar association to DVT in the Bezemer study, raising the possibility that rs6048 may partly or wholly tag a functional non-coding variant in linkage disequilibrium, rather than being the causal change itself.
The Evidence
The key association study is the 2009 analysis by Bezemer and colleagues33 2009 analysis by Bezemer and colleagues
Irene D Bezemer
et al., "F9 Malmö, factor IX and deep vein thrombosis," Haematologica 2009;94(5):693–9.
Combined LETS and MEGA case-control studies with 380+1,469 male cases and factor IX
measurements in 191+823+484 controls, which
combined two Dutch case-control studies (LETS and MEGA) to demonstrate that the G allele
of rs6048 was associated with a 20% reduction in DVT odds: OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.93).
This finding was subsequently replicated in large GWAS datasets. The Klarin 2019
genome-wide association study44 genome-wide association study
Derek Klarin et al., "Genome-wide association analysis of
venous thromboembolism identifies new risk loci and genetic overlap with arterial vascular
disease," Nature Genetics 2019;51:1574–1579. Over 650,000 participants across the Million
Veteran Program and UK Biobank identified the
rs6048-A allele among 33 genomic loci associated with VTE risk (OR ~1.07). The cross-ancestry
replication by Thibord et al. 202255 Thibord et al. 2022
Florian Thibord et al., "Cross-Ancestry Investigation
of Venous Thromboembolism Genomic Predictors," Circulation 2022;146:1225–1242. 135 VTE loci
identified across European, African, and Hispanic cohorts
confirmed rs6048 across European, African, and Hispanic populations.
Importantly, a study of VTE recurrence in 2,185 patients66 study of VTE recurrence in 2,185 patients
Roach et al. 2015, J Thromb
Haemost 2015;13(10):1815–22. Four European cohorts: MEGA, Leiden Thrombophilia Study,
Scottish Thrombophilia Study, Vienna Thrombosis Research Group
found that Factor IX Malmö did not explain the observed sex difference in VTE recurrence risk.
This suggests the variant's modest protective effect applies to first VTE events but does
not substantially alter recurrence dynamics.
The effect size is modest — OR ~0.80 for DVT first event — and the clinical significance classification by the ClinGen Coagulation Factor Deficiency Variant Curation Expert Panel (4-star review, February 2024) is benign for haemophilia B and protective for DVT. This is not a variant that eliminates thrombosis risk; it shifts it modestly on a population scale.
Practical Implications
For carriers of the GG genotype (females with two protective alleles) or males with the G allele, the practical implication is limited: a modest downward adjustment in baseline DVT risk. This does not substitute for standard DVT prevention measures during high-risk situations (surgery, prolonged immobility, hormonal contraceptives), particularly if other prothrombotic variants are present (Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A).
For AA homozygotes and AG heterozygotes, no specific intervention is warranted based on this variant alone, since the common A allele simply represents population-average coagulation factor IX function.
The G allele frequency varies dramatically by ancestry — approximately 30% in Europeans and Ashkenazi Jews, 18% in South Asians, 13% in Africans, and less than 0.2% in East Asians. This means the protective variant is essentially absent in East Asian populations, and population-level DVT risk attributable to this locus differs substantially by ancestry.
Interactions
The most clinically relevant interactions are with other coagulation pathway variants. Factor V Leiden (rs6025) and prothrombin G20210A (rs1799963) are the two most common inherited thrombophilias and act at different points in the coagulation cascade. If a carrier of rs6048-G also carries prothrombotic variants, the modest protective effect of the G allele would be expected to partially, but incompletely, offset the elevated risk. The magnitude of this offset has not been directly quantified in published studies.
The adjacent intronic SNP rs422187 is in strong linkage disequilibrium with rs6048 and showed comparable DVT association in the Bezemer cohort. These variants cannot be distinguished functionally with current evidence.
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Common factor IX Malmö genotype — population-average DVT risk
You carry two copies of the A allele at rs6048, the most common genotype in most populations. This means you do not carry the protective G allele of the Factor IX Malmö variant. Your factor IX function is typical, and your DVT risk from this specific locus is at the population baseline. Approximately 50% of women of European descent share this genotype; in East Asian populations, nearly all individuals have this genotype.
One copy of the Factor IX Malmö protective G allele — mildly reduced DVT risk
You carry one copy of the protective G allele at rs6048. The G allele is associated with an approximately 20% reduction in DVT odds (OR ~0.80) compared to the common A/A genotype. This modest protective effect is population-level in nature — it lowers your baseline probability of a first deep vein thrombosis slightly, but does not eliminate DVT risk or override strong prothrombotic risk factors such as Factor V Leiden or immobility. Roughly 42% of women of European descent carry this heterozygous genotype. The biological mechanism of protection is not yet established.
Two copies of the Factor IX Malmö G allele — modestly reduced DVT risk
You carry two copies of the protective G allele at rs6048 (or, if you are male, one G allele — genotyping chips report hemizygous males as homozygous). This genotype is associated with the full protective effect of Factor IX Malmö: an approximately 20% reduction in first DVT odds relative to the common AA genotype. This is a modest but reproducible population-level effect confirmed across multiple large cohorts and GWAS datasets. The protective mechanism is not fully understood — factor IX antigen levels and activation peptide levels do not differ by genotype, suggesting a subtle functional alteration rather than a change in factor IX quantity. About 8% of women of European descent are GG homozygous; the genotype is extremely rare in East Asian populations.