rs10423928 — GIPR
Intronic GIPR variant that reduces functional GIP receptor expression via altered splicing, impairing the incretin-mediated insulin response while paradoxically lowering BMI
Details
- Gene
- GIPR
- Chromosome
- 19
- Risk allele
- A
- Consequence
- Intronic
- Inheritance
- Additive
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Strong
- Chip coverage
- v3 v4 v5
Population Frequency
Ancestry Frequencies
Category
Nutrition & MetabolismSee your personal result for GIPR
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
The Paradoxical GIP Receptor Variant: Less Insulin, Leaner Body
Every time you eat, your gut releases a hormone called
GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide)11 GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide)
GIP is secreted by
K-cells of the small intestinal mucosa in response to glucose and fat
ingestion; it accounts for roughly half of the incretin effect that amplifies
meal-induced insulin secretion
that signals your pancreas to release insulin. The GIPR gene encodes the
receptor that detects this signal. rs10423928 is a common variant in an
intron of GIPR that subtly disrupts how the receptor is assembled from its
mRNA, with a paradoxical metabolic outcome: reduced insulin response but a
leaner body.
The Mechanism
rs10423928 sits within an intron of GIPR, but its functional impact is
mechanistic, not trivial. The A allele shifts the balance of GIPR mRNA
splice variants: it reduces the proportion of transcripts that include exon
9, which encodes part of the seven-helix transmembrane domain required for a
fully functional, membrane-anchored receptor.
In adipose tissue from A-allele carriers22 In adipose tissue from A-allele carriers
Müller et al. Diabetes 2011 —
analysis of adipose biopsies from the Botnia and Danish Twin cohorts showed
reduced exon-9-containing isoform abundance in A allele
carriers, the proportion of
functional GIPR on the cell surface is modestly but consistently reduced.
The net result is a blunted incretin response specifically after oral glucose or fat ingestion. When A-allele carriers receive glucose by mouth, the GIP released from the gut cannot fully activate their pancreatic beta-cell GIPR, so insulin secretion falls short. Crucially, when glucose is given intravenously — bypassing the GIP signal entirely — insulin secretion is normal. This confirms the defect is specifically in the GIP-mediated incretin pathway, not in basal beta-cell function.
The same reduced GIPR function in adipose tissue has an unexpected upside: GIP normally promotes fat storage and adipogenesis. With less receptor signaling, A-allele carriers accumulate less adipose tissue, resulting in lower BMI, reduced fat mass, and lower lean body mass.
rs10423928 is in near-perfect linkage disequilibrium (r²≈0.99) with the
missense variant rs1800437 (Glu354Gln)33 rs1800437 (Glu354Gln)
The E354Q change sits in exon 10
of GIPR and reduces receptor signaling by increasing desensitization and
downregulation. The two variants
are so tightly co-inherited that they functionally represent the same causal
signal, operating through both splicing and protein-level mechanisms.
The Evidence
The foundational study was a GWAS meta-analysis by Saxena et al. in Nature
Genetics 201044 GWAS meta-analysis by Saxena et al. in Nature
Genetics 2010
Saxena R et al. Genetic variation in GIPR influences the
glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge. Nature Genetics
2010 involving 15,234 discovery
and up to 30,620 total nondiabetic participants. The A allele was associated
with higher 2-hour glucose (beta=0.09 mmol/L per allele, p=2×10⁻¹⁵), lower
insulinogenic index (p=1×10⁻¹⁷), and reduced incretin effect (p=4.3×10⁻⁴) in
804 individuals tested with both oral and intravenous glucose challenges.
A follow-up study in 53,730 nondiabetic and 2,731 diabetic subjects55 53,730 nondiabetic and 2,731 diabetic subjects
Müller
et al. Pleiotropic effects of GIP on islet function involve osteopontin.
Diabetes 2011 confirmed impaired
GIP-stimulated insulin secretion and, strikingly, found that A-allele carriers
had approximately 2.9 kg lower lean body mass and reduced fat mass — with the
BMI-lowering effect nearly completely offsetting the insulin-secretion
impairment in terms of net type 2 diabetes risk.
The Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort66 Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
Renström F et al. Genetic variation in the
GIPR modifies the association between carbohydrate and fat intake and type 2
diabetes risk. JCEM 2012 (24,840
subjects followed 12 years) revealed a striking gene-diet interaction: AA
homozygotes eating a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet had a 69% lower T2D risk
compared to those eating low-fat; TT homozygotes showed 23% lower T2D risk
from a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet. The macronutrient that bypasses
impaired GIP-mediated signaling (fat rather than carbohydrate as the main fuel)
aligns with the reduced incretin effect in A-allele carriers.
Practical Actions
For A-allele carriers (AT or AA genotypes), the impaired GIP-mediated insulin response means that high-carbohydrate meals are less efficiently handled — the insulin surge that normally dampens post-meal glucose is blunted. Shifting calories toward fat (unsaturated and omega-3 rich) and moderating carbohydrate intake — particularly refined carbohydrates and sugars — aligns with both the mechanistic evidence and the Malmö cohort findings. Monitoring postprandial glucose (particularly the 2-hour mark after meals) provides direct feedback on how this genotype affects meal tolerance.
The variant is also pharmacogenomically relevant: tirzepatide (Mounjaro, Zepbound) is a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist that works partly through GIPR. Reduced receptor function from rs10423928 may blunt the GIPR component of tirzepatide's effect, though direct clinical evidence in carriers is not yet published.
Interactions
rs10423928 acts in the incretin pathway alongside GLP-1R variants. The GLP-1R variant rs6923761 (Gly168Ser) affects the parallel incretin arm — GLP-1 signaling — and has been associated with differential responses to GLP-1-based therapies. Carriers of reduced-function variants in both GIPR (rs10423928 A allele) and GLP-1R may have compounded impairment of the overall incretin effect, increasing postprandial glucose excursions. A compound action covering this interaction would be warranted if clinical evidence for combined effects emerges.
Within the GIPR locus, rs10423928 and rs1800437 (E354Q) are in r²≈0.99 LD and co-segregate as a functional haplotype. The related intronic variant rs2302382 has been associated with T2DM risk in Middle Eastern populations and is likely part of the same haplotype block.
Drug Interactions
Nutrient Interactions
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Standard GIP receptor expression and incretin-mediated insulin secretion
You have two copies of the common T allele at rs10423928. Your GIPR gene produces the full proportion of functional, exon-9-containing receptor isoforms, allowing normal GIP-stimulated insulin secretion after meals. About 64% of people of European descent share this genotype. For you, a diet higher in complex carbohydrates and lower in fat is associated with better glucose outcomes according to the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort — the opposite of what benefits A-allele carriers.
One copy of the reduced-function A allele; blunted GIP-mediated insulin response after carbohydrate-rich meals
The blunted incretin response means that your 2-hour post-meal glucose tends to run slightly higher than TT carriers under a standard carbohydrate-rich diet. Evidence from the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (24,840 subjects followed 12 years) shows that A-allele carriers fare better metabolically with a diet emphasizing fat over carbohydrates — the reverse of TT carriers. This is because fat triggers GIP release differently and the impaired GIP→insulin axis matters less when fat (rather than glucose) is the primary postprandial fuel.
The reduced adipose GIPR activity also means less GIP-driven fat accumulation — a partial benefit that largely neutralizes the impaired insulin secretion in terms of overall diabetes risk.
Two copies of the reduced-function A allele; substantially impaired GIP-mediated insulin secretion with corresponding lower BMI tendency
The homozygous AA state produces the maximum reduction in exon-9-containing GIPR mRNA. In the Malmö cohort, AA genotype carriers eating a high-fat (low-carbohydrate) diet had a 69% lower risk of type 2 diabetes compared to AA carriers eating a high-carbohydrate (low-fat) diet — one of the strongest gene-diet interactions documented for a common metabolic variant.
The near-perfect LD with rs1800437 (E354Q) means both splicing disruption and reduced receptor signaling efficiency act simultaneously, creating a compounded reduction in GIP receptor activity.
The blunted GIP effect also means that the GIP component of tirzepatide (a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist used for diabetes and obesity) may be less active in AA carriers, though the GLP-1 component remains unaffected. Direct clinical evidence in AA carriers is not yet published, but the mechanistic basis for reduced tirzepatide GIP-arm efficacy is plausible.
Key References
Saxena et al. Nature Genetics 2010: GWAS in 15,234+ subjects linking rs10423928 A allele to higher 2-hour glucose (beta=0.09 mmol/L, p=2×10⁻¹⁵) and reduced incretin effect
Müller et al. Diabetes 2011: A allele associated with impaired GIP-stimulated insulin secretion, reduced BMI and lean mass in 53,730 subjects; mechanism via reduced exon-9 GIPR splicing
Elks et al. Diabetes 2013: A allele linked to lower adipose osteopontin, reduced GIP receptor function, and improved insulin sensitivity in A-allele carriers
Renstrom et al. JCEM 2012: Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (24,840 subjects): AA genotype benefited from high-fat/low-carb diet (69% reduced T2D risk); TT homozygotes benefited from high-carb/low-fat
Barbosa-Yañez et al. 2020: A allele carriers showed higher insulin sensitivity (Cederholm index) and lower 2-hour glucose in prediabetic subjects
Giannini et al. PLOS ONE 2011: rs10423928 examined in children; no effect on glucose/insulin metabolism in this age group