Research

rs1799752 — ACE I/D (Alu insertion/deletion)

The causal ACE insertion/deletion structural variant — presence or absence of a 287-bp Alu element in intron 16 drives ACE enzyme levels, with the I allele lowering ACE activity (endurance advantage) and the D allele raising it (power/strength adaptation)

Strong Risk Factor Share

Details

Gene
ACE
Chromosome
17
Risk allele
D
Consequence
Structural Variant
Inheritance
Codominant
Clinical
Risk Factor
Evidence
Strong
Chip coverage
v3 v4

Population Frequency

II
23%
ID
50%
DD
27%

Ancestry Frequencies

african
66%
european
59%
latino
41%
south_asian
39%
east_asian
37%

Category

Fitness & Body

See your personal result for ACE

Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.

Upload your DNA data

Works with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.

ACE I/D — The Causal Variant Behind the Endurance–Power Dial

The angiotensin-converting enzyme11 angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACE cleaves angiotensin I into angiotensin II (a potent vasoconstrictor) and inactivates bradykinin (a vasodilator). It sits at the centre of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) governing blood pressure, fluid balance, and vascular tone
gene contains one of the most studied variants in exercise genetics — and this entry covers the variant itself, not its proxy. rs1799752 is the actual 287-base-pair Alu repeat insertion/deletion in intron 16 of ACE; it is the causal variant that drives the differences in circulating and tissue ACE activity. The tag SNP rs4341 (already in the GeneOps database) is a C/G single-nucleotide variant in near-complete linkage disequilibrium with this locus and is used when direct structural genotyping is unavailable. Where a WGS-based genome file genotypes this structural variant directly, rs1799752 gives the most precise readout of ACE biology.

The I allele (insertion present) results in lower ACE activity; the D allele (deletion) results in higher activity. A substantial fraction of inter-individual variation in serum ACE levels is attributable to this single locus — making it the dominant genetic determinant of RAAS tone across the population.

The Mechanism

The Alu element in intron 16 is not just a neutral marker — it exerts a measurable effect on ACE gene expression at the mRNA level. A direct allele-specific quantification study22 direct allele-specific quantification study
Suehiro T et al. Increased amount of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) mRNA originating from the ACE allele with deletion. Hum Genet, 2004
in individuals heterozygous for the I/D measured mRNA from each allele separately. The D allele produced, on average, 1.79 times more ACE mRNA than the I allele in the same cell. This is mechanistically distinct from what a nearby tag SNP captures: the Alu element itself influences mRNA stability or splicing efficiency33 mRNA stability or splicing efficiency
Intronic Alu elements are known to modulate alternative splicing and affect pre-mRNA folding, secondary structure, and interaction with RNA-binding proteins — any of these could reduce I-allele mRNA abundance or stability relative to D-allele mRNA
, resulting in a constitutively lower transcriptional output from the I chromosome.

The functional consequence cascades downstream. DD homozygotes carry substantially more serum ACE activity than II homozygotes; ID heterozygotes are intermediate. Higher ACE activity means more angiotensin II44 angiotensin II
Angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor and anabolic signalling molecule; it promotes skeletal muscle protein synthesis and cardiac hypertrophy via AT1 receptors, and drives aldosterone secretion, sodium retention, and increased blood pressure
and less bradykinin55 bradykinin
Bradykinin is a vasodilator that activates nitric oxide synthase, promotes glucose uptake in working muscle via GLUT4 translocation, and improves metabolic efficiency during sustained aerobic effort; it is rapidly degraded by ACE
. The II genotype does the reverse: lower ACE, prolonged bradykinin, more efficient aerobic muscle metabolism.

The Evidence

The 2024 updated meta-analysis of rs1799752 and public-health sports modalities — the most comprehensive analysis to date — examined 16 studies through June 2024 and found the II genotype associated with elite endurance athlete status66 II genotype associated with elite endurance athlete status
Sommers L et al. Role of the ACE I/D Polymorphism in Selected Public Health-Associated Sporting Modalities: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2024
at OR=1.54 (95% CI 1.24–1.91) versus controls and OR=1.56 (95% CI 1.07–2.28) versus power athletes. Sport-specific analysis revealed the strongest enrichment in triathlon (OR=2.69) and open-water swimming (OR=2.27), with running at OR=1.76.

The mechanistic underpinning for the endurance advantage was clarified by a training study of army recruits77 training study of army recruits
Woods DR et al. Endurance enhancement related to the human ACE I-D polymorphism is not due to differences in the cardiorespiratory response to training. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002
showing that II individuals gained significantly more efficiency — lower oxygen cost at a fixed workload — without a corresponding difference in peak VO2max. The advantage is therefore economic: doing the same aerobic work for less oxygen expenditure, not a larger aerobic ceiling.

For the D allele, evidence converges on strength adaptation and cardiovascular remodelling. DD individuals show larger strength gains per training cycle, greater left ventricular mass increases in response to endurance training, and higher enrichment among sprint and power athletes in multiple cohorts.

The pharmacogenomic dimension of rs1799752 is distinct from its athletic profile. A study of IgA nephropathy patients88 study of IgA nephropathy patients
Teranishi J et al. ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism (rs1799752) modifies the renoprotective effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst, 2014
found that ACE inhibitors and ARBs significantly slowed disease progression in DD patients but had no measurable renoprotective effect in II patients. This genotype-dependent drug response reflects the underlying biology: DD individuals have more angiotensin II substrate for ACE inhibitors to suppress, whereas II individuals already have low baseline RAAS activity, leaving little room for further reduction.

Practical Implications

  • II genotype: Lower ACE activity confers genuine aerobic efficiency advantages, particularly in sustained-output sports (running, triathlon, rowing, altitude events). Training response is likely to favour volume over intensity. ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy, if ever prescribed, may provide less renal protection than it would in DD individuals.
  • DD genotype: Higher ACE activity supports strength adaptation and power-based athletics, but also elevates RAAS tone at rest. Cardiovascular monitoring matters regardless of fitness level. If prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs (for hypertension, heart failure, or renal protection), the drug acts on a more active target enzyme — these medications tend to be more effective and may produce larger blood pressure reductions.
  • ID genotype: Intermediate ACE activity with genuine versatility across athletic modalities. No strong pull toward either endurance or power; training response will be shaped more by program design than genotype.

Relationship to rs4341

rs4341 (the C/G tag SNP, C=insertion, G=deletion) is in near-complete linkage disequilibrium with rs1799752 and can be used as a proxy when direct structural genotyping is unavailable — which is the case for all short-read consumer chip arrays (23andMe v3/v4/v5). When a genome file includes rs1799752 directly (WGS with structural variant calling), this entry provides the definitive interpretation. When only rs4341 is present, the rs4341 entry applies. The underlying biology is identical; the two entries differ only in the confidence of the genotype call and the mechanistic framing.

Interactions

The ACE I/D has been studied alongside ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739)99 ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739) in multiple athlete cohorts. The compound combination of ACE II (insertion homozygote) with ACTN3 XX (both alpha-actinin-3 null) appears to compound endurance advantages; ACE DD with ACTN3 RR compounds power and sprint tendencies. These are the best-studied two-locus interactions in exercise genetics — observational, not interventional, but supported by coherent physiological logic.

ACE activity also interacts functionally with AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186)1010 AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) — the angiotensin II type 1 receptor variant. DD individuals who also carry the AGTR1 C allele (more responsive AT1 receptor) may have amplified angiotensin II signalling through both higher ligand production and enhanced receptor sensitivity. This combination may be relevant to cardiovascular risk assessment.

Drug Interactions

ACE inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, ramipril, perindopril) dose_adjustment literature
angiotensin receptor blockers (losartan, valsartan, irbesartan) dose_adjustment literature

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant:

DI “Intermediate Profile (ID)” Normal

Heterozygous — intermediate ACE activity, balanced endurance/power potential

You carry one insertion allele and one deletion allele at the ACE I/D locus, giving you intermediate ACE enzyme activity — roughly 31% above the II level. This is the most common genotype globally, carried by approximately 50% of people. You have genuine physiological versatility: neither the pronounced aerobic efficiency of II nor the strong power-adaptation tendency of DD.

II “Endurance Profile (II)” Beneficial

Insertion homozygote — lower ACE activity, aerobic efficiency and endurance advantage

The II genotype means both copies of your ACE gene carry the 287-bp Alu insertion, and D-allele mRNA is absent. The consequence is lower ACE enzyme activity in both serum and skeletal muscle tissue. With less ACE, bradykinin is degraded more slowly — sustaining vasodilation, nitric oxide synthesis, and glucose uptake in active muscle. The practical expression is better metabolic economy: the same aerobic power output for a lower oxygen cost.

Research confirms this is an efficiency advantage rather than a larger aerobic ceiling. II individuals show greater reductions in submaximal oxygen consumption after training without proportionally larger VO2max increases, suggesting their training gains are expressed through more efficient oxygen utilization at submaximal intensities.

One pharmacogenomic note: if you are ever prescribed an ACE inhibitor (enalapril, lisinopril, ramipril) or an ARB (losartan, valsartan) for blood pressure or kidney disease, evidence from IgA nephropathy studies suggests these drugs may provide less renoprotective benefit in II individuals than in DD individuals. Discuss genotype-guided RAS blockade with your physician if relevant.

DD “Power Profile (DD)” High Caution

Deletion homozygote — higher ACE activity, strength adaptation tendency and elevated cardiovascular monitoring need

The DD genotype means both ACE gene copies lack the 287-bp Alu insertion, and D-allele mRNA is expressed at approximately 1.79× the rate of I-allele mRNA (measured in heterozygotes, suggesting DD produces proportionally more again). Elevated ACE promotes higher angiotensin II, which drives skeletal muscle protein synthesis via AT1 receptor signalling and supports greater hypertrophic responses to resistance stimuli.

The pharmacogenomic dimension is clinically significant: DD individuals with IgA nephropathy show substantially greater renoprotective benefit from ACE inhibitors and ARBs than II individuals, because the drug suppresses a more active baseline enzyme. If prescribed these agents, expect a more pronounced blood pressure response and potentially more protective kidney effect.

Cardiovascular vigilance is warranted regardless of athletic status. The D allele has been associated with higher resting ACE activity, elevated risk of hypertension-related end-organ changes, and — in the context of high training volumes — greater training-induced cardiac remodelling than is typical.

Key References

PMID: 39595706

Sommers et al. 2024 — updated systematic review and meta-analysis (16 studies, data through June 2024) finding ACE II genotype OR=1.54 (95% CI 1.24–1.91) vs controls and OR=1.56 (95% CI 1.07–2.28) vs power athletes; runners OR=1.76, triathletes OR=2.69, open-water swimmers OR=2.27

PMID: 23358679

Ma et al. 2013 — systematic review and meta-analysis of ACE and ACTN3 studies; ACE II genotype OR=1.35 (95% CI 1.17–1.55) for endurance athlete status across multiple populations

PMID: 15164285

Suehiro et al. 2004 — direct allele-specific mRNA quantification in 12 ID heterozygotes; D-allele ACE mRNA expressed at 1.79-fold higher levels than I-allele mRNA, establishing transcriptional basis for genotype-dependent ACE activity

PMID: 24452035

Teranishi et al. 2014 — rs1799752 modifies renoprotective effect of RAS blockade in IgA nephropathy; ACE inhibitors/ARBs suppress progression in DD patients but not II/ID, making this a pharmacogenomic predictor of treatment response

PMID: 16690893

Sayed-Tabatabaei et al. 2006 — comprehensive review of ACE I/D polymorphism (Circ Res); the I/D accounts for a substantial fraction of inter-individual variation in serum ACE levels; DD homozygotes have markedly higher serum ACE activity than II homozygotes

PMID: 34028240

Ipekoglu et al. 2022 — meta-analysis of 26 studies (2,979 endurance athletes, 10,048 controls) finding II genotype associated with endurance athlete status at OR=1.48 (95% CI 0.30–2.67, p=0.001)

PMID: 11990733

Woods DR et al. 2002 — 58 army recruits homozygous for I or D: II subjects showed greater reduction in submaximal oxygen cost at 80W after training, confirming efficiency rather than VO2max capacity as the mechanism