Research

rs1800955 — DRD4 -521C>T

Promoter variant that modulates dopamine D4 receptor expression in the prefrontal cortex, influencing novelty seeking and cognitive flexibility

Moderate Risk Factor

Details

Gene
DRD4
Chromosome
11
Risk allele
C
Consequence
Regulatory
Inheritance
Codominant
Clinical
Risk Factor
Evidence
Moderate
Chip coverage
v3 v4 v5

Population Frequency

CC
18%
CT
49%
TT
33%

Ancestry Frequencies

european
45%
south_asian
43%
african
40%
latino
40%
east_asian
38%

Related SNPs

The Novelty Seeking Gene — How Dopamine D4 Receptors Shape Your Personality

Deep in the prefrontal cortex — the brain region responsible for planning, decision-making, and impulse control — sits a receptor that helps determine how you respond to novelty, risk, and reward. The dopamine D4 receptor11 dopamine D4 receptor
One of five dopamine receptor subtypes (D1-D5). D4 is unusual because it's concentrated in the prefrontal cortex rather than the striatum, giving it an outsized role in higher cognitive functions like attention, working memory, and behavioral flexibility
is encoded by the DRD4 gene, and its promoter variant22 promoter variant
A variant in the regulatory region upstream of the gene that controls how much of the gene is transcribed into mRNA, and ultimately into protein
rs1800955 (-521C>T) determines how many of these receptors your brain produces.

The DRD4 gene is perhaps best known for its exon 3 VNTR33 exon 3 VNTR
A variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) where a 48-base-pair sequence is repeated 2-11 times. The 7-repeat (7R) allele has been widely associated with ADHD and novelty seeking, but it is NOT detectable on SNP chips
, a repeat-length polymorphism that cannot be measured by SNP chips. The -521C>T promoter variant is the best chip-genotypable proxy for DRD4 functional variation, and it has its own well-documented effects on gene expression and behavior.

The Mechanism

The -521C>T variant sits 521 base pairs upstream of the DRD4 transcription start site, squarely in the gene's core promoter. Okuyama et al.44 Okuyama et al.
Okuyama Y et al. A genetic polymorphism in the promoter region of DRD4 associated with expression and schizophrenia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1999
used transient expression assays to show that the C allele drives approximately 40% higher transcriptional activity than the T allele. More D4 receptors in the prefrontal cortex means greater sensitivity to dopamine signaling in circuits that govern attention, behavioral flexibility, and reward processing.

It is worth noting that a later study55 later study
D'Souza UM et al. No direct effect of the -521 C/T polymorphism in the human dopamine D4 receptor gene promoter on transcriptional activity. BMC Mol Biol, 2006
did not replicate the direct transcriptional effect, suggesting the functional mechanism may involve linkage disequilibrium with other nearby regulatory variants rather than the -521 position alone. Regardless of the precise molecular mechanism, the behavioral associations with this marker are well replicated.

The Evidence

The strongest evidence for rs1800955 comes from personality and behavioral genetics. Okuyama et al.66 Okuyama et al.
Okuyama Y et al. Identification of a polymorphism in the promoter region of DRD4 associated with the human novelty seeking personality trait. Mol Psychiatry, 2000
first reported that CC carriers scored highest on novelty seeking (P=0.0001) in 86 healthy Japanese volunteers, with TT carriers scoring lowest. A meta-analysis by Munafò et al.77 meta-analysis by Munafò et al.
Munafò MR et al. Association of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and approach-related personality traits: meta-analysis and new data. Biol Psychiatry, 2008
confirmed the association with novelty seeking and impulsivity (though not extraversion), estimating the C allele accounts for up to 3% of phenotypic variance — small by individual-gene standards, but among the larger effects in personality genetics.

The clinical implications extend to psychiatric risk. A meta-analysis of schizophrenia studies88 meta-analysis of schizophrenia studies
Mou L et al. A meta-analysis of data associating DRD4 gene polymorphisms with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2018
pooling 2,927 cases and 2,938 controls found the CC genotype confers modestly elevated schizophrenia risk (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.41, P=0.009). This aligns with the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia99 dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia
The longstanding theory that excessive dopamine signaling in certain brain pathways contributes to psychotic symptoms. Antipsychotic medications work primarily by blocking dopamine D2 receptors
, where heightened dopaminergic tone may increase vulnerability.

On the positive side, Gilman et al.1010 Gilman et al.
Gilman TL et al. DRD4 polymorphism associated with greater positive affect in response to negative and neutral social stimuli. Ann Hum Genet, 2022
found that CC carriers maintain higher positive affect during negative and neutral social stimuli across two independent samples (N=120 and N=122) — suggesting emotional resilience or a "rose-tinted glasses" effect that may underlie the novelty-seeking phenotype.

The sensation-seeking association extends to real-world behavior: Thomson et al.1111 Thomson et al.
Thomson CJ et al. The -521 C/T variant in the dopamine-4-receptor gene (DRD4) is associated with skiing and snowboarding behavior. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2013
found CC genotype was significantly associated with sports-specific sensation seeking in 503 experienced skiers and snowboarders (P<0.001).

Practical Implications

This is fundamentally a personality-influencing variant, not a disease-causing one. The C allele tilts you toward novelty seeking, risk tolerance, and cognitive flexibility — traits that can be assets or liabilities depending on context. The key is awareness: understanding your dopaminergic tendency helps you harness its strengths (creativity, adaptability, positive outlook) while managing its downsides (impulsivity, difficulty with routine tasks, risk-taking).

For CC carriers, structured approaches to decision-making can counterbalance impulsive tendencies. Mindfulness practice has been shown to strengthen prefrontal regulation of dopaminergic circuits. Regular physical exercise, particularly aerobic exercise, helps regulate dopamine levels naturally.

For TT carriers, the lower D4 receptor expression means a more methodical, risk-averse cognitive style. While this can mean missing out on spontaneous opportunities, it also provides natural protection against impulsive decision-making. TT carriers may benefit from deliberately seeking out novel experiences to maintain cognitive flexibility.

Interactions

The most documented interaction is with COMT (rs4680), which controls dopamine degradation in the prefrontal cortex. Alfimova et al.1212 Alfimova et al.
Alfimova MV et al. Interaction of dopamine system genes and cognitive functions in patients with schizophrenia and their relatives and in healthy subjects from the general population. Neurosci Behav Physiol, 2007
found that the DRD4 -521C/T and COMT Val158Met genotypes interact to affect verbal fluency and working memory. The combination of CC (high D4 expression) with COMT Met/Met (slow dopamine clearance) creates the highest prefrontal dopamine tone — potentially enhancing creative thinking but also increasing vulnerability to overstimulation. Conversely, COMT Val/Val (fast clearance) combined with TT (low D4 expression) produces the lowest prefrontal dopamine signaling.

DRD4 also interacts with the broader dopamine signaling pathway. Other DRD4 variants (including the exon 3 VNTR and the nearby rs747302 promoter variant) can modify the functional impact of -521C/T, though these interactions are less well characterized for chip-genotypable SNPs.

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant:

TT “Low Expression” Normal

Lower D4 receptor expression — methodical cognitive style with natural impulse control

The TT genotype at rs1800955 represents the lowest level of DRD4 promoter activity. In Okuyama et al.'s 2000 study, TT carriers scored lowest on novelty seeking. This lower D4 receptor expression in the prefrontal cortex means reduced sensitivity to dopamine-mediated novelty signals, which manifests as a more methodical, risk-averse cognitive style.

This is not a disadvantage — in many contexts, a careful, deliberate approach to decisions yields better outcomes than impulsive novelty seeking. TT carriers show no elevated risk for schizophrenia from this variant and may be naturally protected from impulsive decision-making that can lead to financial, social, or health consequences.

In Gilman et al.'s (2022) emotion studies, T carriers (CT and TT) showed lower positive affect during negative social stimuli compared to CC carriers. This may reflect more realistic emotional appraisal rather than any emotional deficit.

CT “Intermediate Expression” Intermediate Caution

Intermediate D4 receptor expression — balanced novelty seeking and impulse control

The CT heterozygous genotype falls between the two extremes for DRD4 expression and associated behavioral traits. In the Okuyama et al. (2000) novelty seeking study, CT carriers scored between CC (highest) and TT (lowest). The Munafò et al. (2008) meta-analysis treated the C allele effect as additive, meaning each C allele contributes incrementally to approach-related personality traits.

For emotion processing, Gilman et al. (2022) grouped CT carriers with TT as "T carriers" and found them lower in positive affect during negative social stimuli compared to CC homozygotes. This suggests the C allele effect on emotional resilience may require two copies for its full expression.

The schizophrenia risk associated with the CC genotype does not apply to CT carriers at the same level. The meta-analysis by Mou et al. (2018) identified the CC genotype specifically, not C-allele carriers generally, as the risk group.

CC “High Expression” High Caution

Higher D4 receptor expression — associated with novelty seeking, cognitive flexibility, and emotional resilience

The CC genotype at rs1800955 represents the highest level of DRD4 promoter activity. In Okuyama et al.'s original 2000 study, CC carriers scored highest on novelty seeking (P=0.0001) using the Temperament and Character Inventory. Munafò et al.'s 2008 meta-analysis confirmed this association extends to impulsivity measures, estimating the C allele explains up to 3% of phenotypic variance in approach-related traits.

The Gilman et al. (2022) emotion processing studies are particularly interesting: across two independent samples using different emotion elicitation methods (film clips and Cyberball social rejection paradigm), CC individuals consistently reported higher positive affect during neutral and negative social stimuli compared to T carriers. This suggests a genuine positivity bias rather than reduced emotional sensitivity.

The schizophrenia association from Mou et al.'s 2018 meta-analysis (OR 1.22) is statistically significant but clinically modest. The vast majority of CC carriers will never develop schizophrenia — this represents a small shift in population risk, not an individual prediction.

Thomson et al. (2013) provided real-world behavioral evidence: among 503 experienced skiers and snowboarders, CC carriers scored significantly higher on sports-specific sensation seeking (P<0.001), though notably not on general impulsive sensation seeking, suggesting the effect is context-dependent.

Key References

PMID: 10329380

Okuyama et al. 1999 — identified the -521C>T polymorphism and showed the T allele reduces DRD4 transcription by 40% compared to C allele

PMID: 10673770

Okuyama et al. 2000 — first association of -521C/T with novelty seeking (P=0.0001); CC genotype had highest novelty seeking scores

PMID: 17574217

Munafò et al. 2008 — meta-analysis supporting C-521T association with approach-related traits (novelty seeking, impulsivity); up to 3% phenotypic variance

PMID: 29379288

Mou et al. 2018 — meta-analysis of 10 studies (2,927 cases, 2,938 controls) showing CC genotype is a risk factor for schizophrenia (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.41)

PMID: 35574658

Gilman et al. 2022 — CC individuals show higher positive affect during negative/neutral social stimuli compared to T carriers across two independent samples

PMID: 23252368

Thomson et al. 2013 — CC genotype associated with sports-specific sensation seeking in 503 skiers and snowboarders (P<0.001)

PMID: 17763983

Alfimova et al. 2007 — DRD4 -521C/T x COMT Val158Met interaction affects verbal fluency and working memory in healthy controls and schizophrenia patients