rs243865 — MMP2 C-1306T
Promoter polymorphism that disrupts an Sp1-binding site and reduces MMP-2 enzyme production, affecting extracellular matrix remodeling in connective tissue and adipose tissue
Details
- Gene
- MMP2
- Chromosome
- 16
- Risk allele
- C
- Consequence
- Regulatory
- Inheritance
- Codominant
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Moderate
- Chip coverage
- v3 v4 v5
Population Frequency
Ancestry Frequencies
Related SNPs
Category
Fitness & BodySee your personal result for MMP2
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
The ECM Dimmer Switch: How rs243865 Controls MMP-2 Production
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), also called gelatinase A, is the body's primary enzyme for
dissolving type IV collagen — the scaffolding that forms basement membranes throughout virtually
every tissue. When fat cells expand, when capillaries branch, when wounds heal, MMP-2 is the
molecular digger clearing the way by breaking down this dense collagen framework.
MMP-2 is constitutively expressed and tightly regulated by a complex involving MT1-MMP (MMP14)
and TIMP-211 MMP-2 is constitutively expressed and tightly regulated by a complex involving MT1-MMP (MMP14)
and TIMP-2
Unlike most MMPs which require inflammatory induction, MMP-2 is always present in
tissue at baseline, activated or inhibited depending on the local balance of its cofactors.
In adipose tissue specifically, MMP-2 activity is essential for the ECM remodeling that accommodates
fat-cell expansion; without it, adipocyte growth is constrained by a rigid collagen cage.
The rs243865 variant, a C→T transition at position –1306 of the MMP2 promoter, sits directly within
an Sp1-binding site (CCACC box)22 Sp1-binding site (CCACC box)
Sp1 is a transcription factor that binds CCACC sequences in
gene promoters to drive constitutive gene expression.
The T allele destroys this binding site, reducing MMP-2 promoter activity by approximately 50% compared
to the C allele. The result: TT carriers produce significantly less MMP-2 enzyme than CC carriers;
CT heterozygotes are intermediate.
The Mechanism
This is a classic regulatory variant33 regulatory variant
A variant that affects how much of a gene is produced,
rather than altering the protein's structure or function.
When the C allele is present, Sp1 binds normally and drives full MMP-2 transcription. The T allele
disrupts this binding, resulting in lower baseline MMP-2 expression. Since MMP-2 protein structure
is unchanged, whatever enzyme is produced by T allele carriers is fully functional — there is simply
less of it.
In adipose tissue, the consequence is a shift in the balance between ECM rigidity and remodeling
capacity. Low MMP-2 expression means slower breakdown of basement membrane collagen IV, reduced
capillary sprouting, and impaired accommodation of expanding adipocytes. Over time, chronic low MMP-2
activity promotes ECM stiffness and fibrosis — hallmarks of lipedema pathology where progressive
interstitial collagen accumulation and connective tissue thickening accompany uncontrolled lower-body
adipose expansion. Lipedema adipose tissue shows significantly altered MMP expression including
decreased MMP2, MMP9, and MMP1144 Lipedema adipose tissue shows significantly altered MMP expression including
decreased MMP2, MMP9, and MMP11
This parallels the reduced ECM remodeling capacity seen genetically
in high-C-allele carriers.
Conversely, CC carriers with high MMP-2 production have more active ECM remodeling — providing more flexible tissue accommodation for fat cell expansion, but also potentially contributing to structural instability in other contexts (vessel walls, basement membranes in stressed tissues).
The Evidence
The functional consequence of this polymorphism was established in two landmark studies. Price et al.
200255 Price et al.
2002
781 lung cancer cases and 852 controls in a Chinese population; p < 0.001 for genotype
association showed that CC genotype carried a 2.2-fold
increased risk for lung cancer (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.70–2.79), with the effect amplified 10-fold in
heavy smokers. Ye et al. 200366 Ye et al. 2003
274 gastric cardia adenocarcinoma cases and 426 controls
replicated the finding with an even larger effect (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.34–4.97 for CC vs CT/TT).
Both studies confirmed the functional mechanism: T allele disrupts the Sp1 site and reduces promoter
activity by ~50%.
A 2015 meta-analysis77 2015 meta-analysis
29 case-control studies, 8,590 cancer cases and 9,601 controls across
multiple cancer types confirmed the direction: CT genotype
was significantly protective compared to CC (OR 0.758, 95% CI 0.637–0.902), and the dominant model
(CT+TT vs CC) also showed protective effect (OR 0.816, 95% CI 0.678–0.982). The TT homozygous state
did not show additional protection over CT, suggesting the primary benefit is from having at least one
T allele to reduce Sp1 binding.
For body composition, Chang et al. 201188 Chang et al. 2011
546 New Zealand children aged 7 years; part of the CHDS
cohort found that the C allele of rs243865 was associated
with higher percentage body fat (estimate 1.40, 95% CI 0.16–2.64, p = 0.027), though this was
attenuated after covariate adjustment (p = 0.055). The broader MMP-2 promoter haplotype including
rs243865 remained significantly associated with body fat percentage after full adjustment (p = 0.040),
indicating the C allele's effect on adipose ECM remodeling has measurable phenotypic consequences even
in childhood.
The cardiovascular picture is more nuanced. A dedicated meta-analysis on coronary artery disease99 meta-analysis on coronary artery disease
2,118 samples found no significant association between
-1306 C/T and CAD risk overall (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78–1.10). However, a 2025 cross-sectional study
in resistant hypertension1010 2025 cross-sectional study
in resistant hypertension
78 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension; small sample but detailed
phenotyping found that T allele carriers had
significantly lower ejection fraction (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.3–51.4) and higher carotid artery stenosis
prevalence (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.1–20.1). In this high-cardiovascular-risk setting, lower MMP-2 expression
may impair adaptive vascular remodeling.
Evidence level for this SNP is moderate: the functional mechanism is well-established and replicated across multiple systems, but most associations are from case-control studies with population-specific effects, and there are no clinical practice guidelines.
Practical Implications
For CC carriers (the majority), high MMP-2 production supports active ECM remodeling — helpful for normal adipose expansion, angiogenesis, and tissue adaptation, but potentially problematic when chronic inflammation drives sustained matrix degradation. Supporting connective tissue integrity through adequate vitamin C (collagen synthesis), omega-3 fatty acids (anti-inflammatory reduction of MMP overactivation), and protein intake to maintain the structural proteins that MMP-2 degrades becomes especially relevant.
For TT carriers, reduced MMP-2 expression means the ECM is less remodeled — which reduces cancer risk through slower basement membrane breakdown and tumor invasion, but may limit adipose tissue adaptability and reduce vascular remodeling capacity under cardiovascular stress. The reduced cancer risk from the T allele should not be confused with protection from cardiovascular fibrosis.
For the lipedema context specifically, both extremes create risk through different mechanisms: excess MMP-2 (CC) may drive uncontrolled remodeling and capillary fragility, while deficient MMP-2 (TT) impairs the orderly matrix remodeling needed to resolve fibrosis, potentially contributing to progressive tissue stiffening.
Interactions
rs243865 is part of a three-SNP haplotype block with rs243864 and rs2438661111 rs243864 and rs243866
These three promoter
variants are in high linkage disequilibrium with each other; the GTA haplotype at all three positions
was significantly associated with percentage body fat in children.
Individual SNP effects at rs243865 alone may underestimate the true haplotype effect. The MMP-2/TIMP-2
axis is directly relevant: high TIMP-2 (from rs7201 polymorphisms) combined with low MMP-2 (TT at
rs243865) would compound the ECM remodeling deficit. The interaction between MMP-2 and MMP-3 (rs3025058)
is particularly relevant for connective tissue health — both enzymes target the same basement membrane
substrates and their combined activity determines net matrix turnover rate.
Supervisor note — candidate compound interaction: carriers of low-MMP-2 (TT at rs243865) combined with high-MMP-3 expression (TT at rs3025058, 5A/5A) represent a potentially destabilizing combination — reduced type IV collagen clearance from MMP-2 deficiency alongside elevated MMP-3 stromelysin activity. The net effect on connective tissue stability would depend on which substrates each enzyme preferentially targets in a given tissue context.
Nutrient Interactions
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Common genotype with full Sp1-driven MMP-2 production and active extracellular matrix remodeling
The CC genotype represents the common high-expression state of MMP-2. Full Sp1 binding at the -1306 position maintains constitutive MMP-2 transcription, ensuring adequate enzyme availability for normal tissue homeostasis. The same high expression that supports normal adipose ECM remodeling and wound healing creates vulnerability to excessive matrix degradation when chronic inflammation upregulates MMP-2 activity beyond its normal maintenance function. In the context of lipedema pathology, where MMP2 expression is characteristically reduced in affected tissue, CC carriers' genetically higher MMP-2 expression could theoretically support more normal remodeling — but the relationship between germline promoter genotype and local tissue MMP expression in diseased tissue is not yet established.
One T allele partially reduces Sp1 binding, moderating MMP-2 production and conferring modest protection
Heterozygous CT carriers occupy a biologically meaningful intermediate position. The functional data clearly show that having one T allele reduces MMP2 promoter activity compared to CC, and this translates to measurable clinical differences: the 2015 meta-analysis across 29 studies found the CT genotype was the most strongly associated with reduced cancer risk, specifically in the dominant model. The mechanism is a partial reduction in Sp1-driven transcription — one functional site remains (C allele), one is disrupted (T allele).
In the body composition context, one study of premenopausal women found CT heterozygotes had intermediate adipose parameters — more T allele copies correlated with higher non-dense (fatty) area in mammography, suggesting a dose-dependent relationship between T allele count and adipose tissue expansion phenotype. For cardiovascular outcomes, the intermediate MMP-2 expression level may represent the most balanced remodeling state, though data at this level of stratification are limited.
Two T alleles substantially reduce Sp1 binding and MMP-2 production, limiting extracellular matrix remodeling capacity
TT homozygosity represents the extreme of the MMP-2 expression range at this locus. The reduced promoter activity is well-established functionally: the T allele disrupts the CCACC Sp1 recognition sequence at position -1306, and with both alleles disrupted, neither produces full transcription. The meta-analysis data on cancer risk shows a somewhat paradoxical pattern: CT heterozygotes show the strongest protective effect, while TT homozygotes show an intermediate result that is not statistically significant in isolation — suggesting that near-complete MMP-2 depletion may create different problems than a moderate reduction.
In connective tissue and adipose contexts, very low MMP-2 impairs three critical processes: (1) breakdown of old or damaged type IV collagen in basement membranes, (2) activation of adipogenesis-related ECM remodeling during fat cell differentiation, and (3) angiogenic sprouting that requires basement membrane dissolution. In vascular tissue, reduced MMP-2-mediated remodeling capacity may impair adaptive vessel wall changes, potentially contributing to impaired vascular compliance. The 2025 data from resistant hypertension patients showing higher ejection fraction impairment and carotid stenosis in T allele carriers is consistent with inadequate vascular remodeling under high-pressure conditions.
Key References
Price et al. 2002 — CC genotype associated with 2.2-fold increased lung cancer risk in Chinese population; T allele disrupts Sp1 site and reduces MMP-2 promoter activity
Ye et al. 2003 — CC genotype associated with >3-fold increased risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma; confirmed functional role of Sp1 site disruption by T allele
Chang et al. 2011 — MMP-2 promoter haplotype including rs243865 associated with percentage body fat in New Zealand children; C allele linked to higher adiposity
Zhang et al. 2015 — meta-analysis of 29 studies (8,590 cases / 9,601 controls); CT genotype associated with reduced cancer risk vs CC (OR 0.758, 95% CI 0.637–0.902)
Shi et al. 2015 — meta-analysis found no significant association between -1306 C/T and coronary artery disease risk (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78–1.10)
Baloghova et al. 2021 — CC genotype associated with later age-at-onset in Alzheimer's disease patients; T allele carriers had earlier symptom onset
Dias et al. 2025 — T allele in resistant hypertension associated with lower ejection fraction (OR 8.1) and higher carotid stenosis prevalence (OR 4.5)