Research

rs4341 — ACE I/D tag SNP

Tag SNP for the ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism — the C allele tracks the insertion (lower ACE activity, endurance advantage) and the G allele tracks the deletion (higher ACE activity, power/strength advantage)

Strong Risk Factor Share

Details

Gene
ACE
Chromosome
17
Risk allele
G
Consequence
Intronic
Inheritance
Codominant
Clinical
Risk Factor
Evidence
Strong
Chip coverage
v3 v4 v5

Population Frequency

CC
23%
CG
50%
GG
27%

Ancestry Frequencies

east_asian
65%
south_asian
58%
latino
57%
european
47%
african
41%

Category

Fitness & Body

See your personal result for ACE

Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.

Upload your DNA data

Works with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.

ACE I/D — The Endurance–Power Dial

The angiotensin-converting enzyme11 angiotensin-converting enzyme
ACE cleaves angiotensin I into angiotensin II (a potent vasoconstrictor) and inactivates bradykinin (a vasodilator). It sits at the centre of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) governing blood pressure, fluid balance, and vascular tone
gene is home to one of the most studied variants in the history of exercise genetics. The ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism — a 287-base-pair Alu repeat sequence in intron 16 — determines circulating and tissue ACE activity in a dose-dependent manner: the D allele drives ACE levels up, the I allele keeps them down. Because standard short-read sequencing arrays cannot reliably genotype this structural variant directly, rs4341 serves as its practical proxy. rs4341 is an intronic C/G SNP in near-complete linkage disequilibrium with the I/D locus: the C allele tags the insertion, and the G allele tags the deletion.

This SNP has been studied in elite mountaineers, endurance runners, rowers, triathletes, sprint athletes, and strength trainers across dozens of populations. The picture that emerges is not a single "athletic gene" but a genuine biological dial — turned one way for aerobic efficiency and endurance, turned the other for power output and strength adaptation.

The Mechanism

ACE sits at a critical enzymatic crossroads. When the D allele is present — particularly in homozygous form (GG at rs4341) — ACE activity is elevated in both serum and skeletal muscle tissue. The consequence is higher circulating angiotensin II22 higher circulating angiotensin II
Angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor that also promotes protein synthesis and cardiac hypertrophy via AT1 receptor signalling, making it anabolic for skeletal muscle under conditions of resistance training
, which promotes vasoconstriction and skeletal muscle protein synthesis, and accelerated bradykinin degradation33 accelerated bradykinin degradation
Bradykinin is a vasodilator that also activates nitric oxide synthase and promotes glucose uptake; its half-life is sharply reduced by elevated ACE activity
, which reduces vasodilation and nitric oxide-mediated signalling.

The I allele (C at rs4341) does the opposite: lower ACE activity means less angiotensin II production and prolonged bradykinin half-life. Bradykinin signals through B2 receptors44 B2 receptors
B2 bradykinin receptors activate phospholipase C and nitric oxide synthase, improving glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and promoting vasodilation during sustained exercise
to promote nitric oxide synthesis, vasodilation, improved glucose uptake in working muscle, and greater mitochondrial efficiency — all traits that support sustained aerobic output.

The Evidence

The foundational evidence comes from decades of athlete cohort studies, capped by two major meta-analyses. A 2022 meta-analysis of 26 studies55 2022 meta-analysis of 26 studies
Ipekoglu G et al. A meta-analysis on the association of ACE and PPARA gene variants and endurance athletic status. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2022
covering 2,979 endurance athletes and 10,048 controls found the II genotype (CC at rs4341) significantly enriched among endurance athletes at OR=1.48. A complementary systematic review and meta-analysis of ACE and ACTN3 studies66 systematic review and meta-analysis of ACE and ACTN3 studies
Ma F et al. The association of sport performance with ACE and ACTN3 genetic polymorphisms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2013
found II genotype at OR=1.35 (95% CI 1.17–1.55) for endurance athlete status, while D allele carriers showed advantages in strength- and power-based events.

The altitude evidence is particularly striking. A study of 141 mountaineers77 study of 141 mountaineers
Thompson J et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and successful ascent to extreme high altitude. High Alt Med Biol, 2007
attempting peaks above 8,000 metres found the I allele strongly enriched in those who successfully summited — the II group averaged maximum altitudes of 8,559 m versus 8,079 m for DD, a difference of nearly 500 vertical metres. This likely reflects greater aerobic efficiency under hypoxia rather than VO2max per se.

A training study of 58 army recruits88 training study of 58 army recruits
Woods DR et al. Endurance enhancement related to the human ACE I-D polymorphism is not due to differences in the cardiorespiratory response to training. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002
homozygous for either allele found that II subjects showed significantly greater reductions in submaximal oxygen consumption at 80W after training, suggesting the I allele's advantage lies in metabolic efficiency — doing the same work for less oxygen — rather than a simple increase in peak VO2max.

For the D allele, evidence points toward strength adaptation. A 12-year review of ACE exercise genetics99 12-year review of ACE exercise genetics
Puthucheary Z et al. The ACE gene and human performance: 12 years on. Sports Medicine, 2011
noted that the D allele is associated with greater left ventricular mass increases in response to endurance training, larger strength gains in resistance training programs, and enrichment among elite swimmers and short-distance sprinters in several national athlete cohorts.

Practical Implications

This SNP does not determine athletic destiny — elite endurance athletes and elite power athletes carry every genotype. But it does represent a genuine biological tendency that can inform training priorities:

  • If you carry CC (II): your aerobic machinery is biased toward efficiency. Sustained efforts — long runs, cycling, rowing, altitude sports — align well with your physiology. Your training response may favour volume over intensity, and altitude camps may bring above-average adaptation.
  • If you carry GG (DD): your RAAS is tuned for higher outputs of angiotensin II. Resistance training tends to produce larger strength gains, and explosive, power-based activities play to your physiological tendencies. Cardiovascular monitoring is worth discussing with a physician, since the D allele is linked to higher cardiovascular disease risk in non-athletic contexts.
  • If you carry CG (ID): you have the intermediate phenotype — one of each allele, with intermediate ACE activity. Most people carry this genotype. You have genuine versatility without a strong pull in either direction.

Interactions

The ACE I/D has been studied in combination with ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739)1010 ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739) in multiple athlete cohorts. The combination of ACE II (CC) with ACTN3 XX (TT) appears to compound endurance advantages, while ACE DD (GG) with ACTN3 RR (CC) compounds power/sprint tendencies. These are observational associations without interventional confirmation but represent the best-studied two-locus interaction in exercise genetics.

ACE activity also interacts with AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186)1111 AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) — the angiotensin II type 1 receptor variant. Individuals with both elevated ACE activity (D allele) and a more responsive AT1 receptor (C allele) may have amplified angiotensin II signalling, relevant to cardiovascular risk assessment and potentially to training-induced cardiac remodelling.

The MCT1 A1470T (rs1049434)1212 MCT1 A1470T (rs1049434) variant in the lactate transporter gene is a functionally independent but thematically related fitness SNP — lactate clearance complements aerobic capacity in determining sustained high-intensity performance.

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant:

CG “Intermediate Profile (ID)” Normal

Heterozygous — intermediate ACE activity, balanced endurance/power potential

You carry one insertion allele (C) and one deletion allele (G), giving you intermediate ACE activity. This is the most common genotype in most populations — about 50% of people globally carry this combination. You have genuine versatility: neither the strong aerobic bias of the CC genotype nor the pronounced power tendency of the GG genotype.

CC “Endurance Profile (II)” Beneficial

Insertion homozygote — lower ACE activity, endurance and efficiency advantage

The CC genotype corresponds to homozygosity for the ACE insertion allele. Your tissues — including skeletal muscle and heart — express less ACE activity on average. The downstream consequence is a sustained bradykinin signal, which promotes nitric oxide synthesis, vasodilation, and improved glucose uptake during aerobic exercise. The practical result is greater metabolic efficiency: doing the same aerobic work for less oxygen cost, particularly at submaximal intensities.

Research suggests the advantage is less about peak VO2max and more about exercise economy — how efficiently you convert oxygen into mechanical work. At altitude, where oxygen is scarce, this efficiency advantage becomes especially significant.

GG “Power Profile (DD)” High Caution

Deletion homozygote — higher ACE activity, strength and power adaptation tendency

The GG genotype corresponds to homozygosity for the ACE deletion allele. Elevated ACE activity means higher circulating and tissue angiotensin II, which has anabolic effects on skeletal muscle (promoting protein synthesis) and drives greater cardiac hypertrophy in response to training. Multiple studies find DD individuals show larger strength gains per training cycle compared to II individuals.

The tradeoff is that elevated ACE/angiotensin II activity is also associated with higher blood pressure, greater risk of left ventricular hypertrophy beyond athletic adaptation, and — in non-athletic contexts — increased susceptibility to heart failure progression, diabetic nephropathy, and hypertension. The D allele raises cardiovascular risk independently of athletic status.

Key References

PMID: 11091119

Woods et al. 2000 — foundational review establishing the ACE I/D mechanism: D allele elevates serum/tissue ACE, raises angiotensin II, reduces bradykinin half-life; I allele linked to enhanced endurance performance

PMID: 34028240

Ipekoglu et al. 2022 — meta-analysis of 26 studies (2,979 endurance athletes, 10,048 controls) finding II genotype associated with endurance athlete status at OR=1.48 (95% CI 0.30–2.67, p=0.001)

PMID: 23358679

Systematic review and meta-analysis of ACE and ACTN3 studies finding II genotype OR=1.35 (95% CI 1.17–1.55) for endurance athlete status; I allele favors endurance, D allele favors power

PMID: 18081503

Thompson J et al. 2007 — 141 mountaineers: I allele overrepresented in successful >8,000m summiteers (0.55 vs 0.36); II genotype averaged 8,559m max altitude vs 8,079m for DD

PMID: 11781693

Nazarov et al. 2001 — 217 Russian athletes: D allele excess in short-distance athletes (0.72, p=0.001), I allele excess in middle-distance athletes (0.63, p=0.032)

PMID: 19026021

Wang et al. 2008 — Sports Medicine review: I allele carriers show higher VO2max, greater training response, and increased muscle efficiency; mechanism involves lower angiotensin II and higher bradykinin

PMID: 21615186

Puthucheary et al. 2011 — 12-year review: I allele consistent with endurance/triathlon/mountaineering; D allele with strength gains and cardiac hypertrophy response to training

PMID: 11990733

Woods DR et al. 2002 — 58 army recruits: II subjects showed greater reduction in submaximal oxygen cost at 80W after training, though VO2max gains did not differ — suggests efficiency rather than capacity mechanism

PMID: 35593181

Kumagai H et al. 2023 — ACE rs4341 among polymorphisms associated with artistic gymnastic performance in Japanese athletes