rs10925254 — MTR
Deep intronic MTR variant associated with reduced cleft lip/palate risk via lower methionine synthase expression
Details
- Gene
- MTR
- Chromosome
- 1
- Risk allele
- T
- Clinical
- Protective
- Evidence
- Emerging
Population Frequency
Category
Methylation & DetoxSee your personal result for MTR
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
MTR rs10925254 — A Regulatory Intronic Variant Linking Methyl Donor Flux to Craniofacial Development
Methionine synthase (MTR) performs one of the most consequential single-step
reactions in human metabolism: it converts
homocysteine11 homocysteine
Homocysteine: a sulfur-containing amino acid that accumulates when the methylation cycle is impaired; elevated levels are neurotoxic and associated with cardiovascular disease and birth defects
back to methionine using methylcobalamin (active vitamin B12) as a cofactor and
5-methyltetrahydrofolate (methylfolate) as the methyl donor. The methionine
produced is then converted to
S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)22 S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)
SAM: the universal methyl donor for DNA methylation, histone methylation, and over 200 methyltransferase reactions critical to embryonic gene regulation,
the cell's primary currency for epigenetic regulation.
rs10925254 is a deep intronic variant in the MTR gene — it lies within intron
sequence and does not alter the protein. It sits approximately 111 nucleotides
into the intron in multiple transcript isoforms. Its clinical relevance emerges
from a 2021 case-control study linking it, along with two sister intronic variants
in the same gene, to significantly reduced risk of
nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate33 nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate
Nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate (NSCL/P): the most common craniofacial birth defect, affecting 1 in 700 births worldwide; "nonsyndromic" means it occurs without associated malformation syndromes
(NSCL/P).
The Mechanism
Intronic variants can influence gene expression through several non-coding
mechanisms: disrupting or creating splice regulatory signals, altering the binding
of transcription factors or repressors embedded within intronic regulatory
elements, or modifying mRNA secondary structure and stability. For rs10925254,
the Salamanca et al. 2021 study found that the protective C allele correlates
with reduced MTR expression in genomic expression databases — meaning it appears
to act as a
cis-regulatory element44 cis-regulatory element
Cis-regulatory: influencing the expression of the gene on the same chromosome without altering its protein sequence
that modestly dampens MTR transcription.
This creates a counterintuitive picture: lower MTR expression appears protective
against cleft development. The authors hypothesize this may reflect altered
SAM flux55 SAM flux
SAM flux: the rate at which S-adenosylmethionine is produced and consumed; too much or too little can both disrupt the methylation reactions that regulate gene expression during embryogenesis
during the critical embryonic window of palate closure. Craniofacial development
is exquisitely sensitive to one-carbon metabolism — the longstanding protective
effect of periconceptional folate supplementation on cleft risk independently
confirms this pathway's developmental importance. The C allele's expression-
dampening effect may tune SAM flux to optimal levels during this window.
The variant is in the same deep intronic cluster as rs10925239 and rs3768142, which showed identical OR and direction of effect in the same study. All three likely tag the same regulatory haplotype block rather than acting independently.
The Evidence
The primary evidence comes from a
Chilean case-control study66 Chilean case-control study
Salamanca C et al. Genetic variants in S-adenosyl-methionine synthesis pathway and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Chile. Pediatric Research, 2021
of 234 NSCL/P cases and 309 controls examining 18 SNPs across SAM synthesis
pathway genes (AHCY, MTR, MTRR, MAT2A). Of these, three deep intronic MTR variants
survived multiple-testing correction (q < 0.05): rs10925239 (OR 0.68,
p=0.0032, q=0.0192), rs10925254 (OR 0.66, p=0.0018, q=0.0162), and rs3768142
(OR 0.66, p=0.0015, q=0.0097). All three showed the same protective direction
and correlated with reduced MTR expression in database annotations.
Biological plausibility is supported by converging lines of evidence. A study by
Fofou-Caillierez et al.77 Fofou-Caillierez et al.
Fofou-Caillierez MB et al. Vitamin B-12 and liver activity and expression of methionine synthase are decreased in fetuses with neural tube defects. Am J Clin Nutr, 2019
found MTR activity, mRNA, and protein expression were all significantly reduced
in fetal livers from neural tube defect cases (p=0.001, 0.016, and 0.003
respectively), with SAM levels tightly correlated with MTR activity and B12
status — directly confirming that MTR expression governs methyl donor supply
during critical fetal development windows. A
folate pathway study88 folate pathway study
Blanton SH et al. Folate pathway and nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Birth Defects Res A, 2011
by Blanton et al. found MTR association with cleft risk specifically in Hispanic
populations, with gene-gene interactions in the methionine arm of one-carbon
metabolism.
At the gene level, the role of MTR in connecting B12 status, folate metabolism,
and developmental methylation is well-established. Studies of the coding MTR
variant A2756G (rs1805087) show associations with elevated NTD risk in some
populations, and
maternal MTR genotype99 maternal MTR genotype
Mostowska A et al. Maternal MTR genotype contributes to the risk of non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in the Polish population. Clin Genet, 2006
has been associated with a 2.2-fold increased risk of having a child with
cleft lip/palate, providing biological plausibility for expression-level effects
at the same locus.
The evidence for rs10925254 is emerging: a single case-control study, population- limited to Chile, with no independent replication yet published.
Practical Actions
Because the variant is intronic and affects gene expression rather than enzyme kinetics, practical management focuses on ensuring the methylation cycle has adequate substrate regardless of MTR expression level. T allele carriers — who lack the expression-dampening C allele — have no direct enzyme defect to compensate for, but optimizing B12 and folate supply represents a reasonable precautionary measure. The form of supplementation matters: active B12 forms (methylcobalamin, hydroxocobalamin) and methylfolate are preferred because they enter the MTR reaction directly without requiring additional enzymatic conversion.
Homocysteine monitoring provides the most actionable functional readout: elevated homocysteine signals that overall methylation cycle throughput is suboptimal, regardless of which specific variant contributes.
Interactions
rs10925254 sits in the same deep intronic cluster as rs10925239 and rs3768142, and in the same gene as the coding MTR A2756G variant (rs1805087). Combined T allele burden across intronic MTR variants plausibly compounds any methylation cycle strain. Upstream, MTHFR (rs1801133 C677T, rs1801131 A1298C) controls methylfolate supply, and MTRR (rs1801394 A66G) reactivates oxidized B12 after each MTR cycle. Carriers of T alleles at rs10925254 alongside functional variants in MTHFR or MTRR have compounded demands on the methylation cycle as a whole.
Nutrient Interactions
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Two common C alleles — no elevated NSCL/P risk
You carry two copies of the C allele, the most common genotype in global populations (about 42% globally). Based on the Salamanca et al. 2021 study, the C allele correlates with reduced MTR expression and is associated with lower risk of cleft lip/palate relative to T allele carriers. This is the baseline-risk genotype for this locus.
One T allele — slightly reduced protection
The CT genotype is the most common globally (approximately 46%). The T allele frequency varies across populations but is in the minority worldwide: roughly 37% in European populations (ALSPAC cohort), 26% in Japanese (TOMMO), and 38% in African ancestry groups. This variant is emerging-level evidence — not yet independently replicated — so clinical action based solely on it is not warranted. It should be interpreted alongside other methylation cycle variants (MTHFR, MTRR, other MTR SNPs).
Two T alleles — associated with elevated NSCL/P risk
The TT genotype is uncommon globally (approximately 12%), with frequency varying by ancestry: roughly 14% in European populations, 7% in Japanese (TOMMO), and 14% in African ancestry groups. The risk_allele assignment (T = risk) is based on the Salamanca 2021 study finding the C allele protective (OR 0.66), which implies T allele carriers have higher relative risk. However, the exact T allele direction has not been independently confirmed from the full text — this is flagged for verification.
The hypothesized mechanism is that TT homozygotes maintain higher MTR expression (lacking the C allele's dampening effect), which alters SAM flux during the precise developmental window of palate closure. This remains speculative; no mechanistic study has characterized this specific variant's regulatory effects. Monitoring overall methylation cycle function via homocysteine testing is the most evidence-grounded clinical approach.