rs1800795 — IL6 -174G/C
Promoter variant controlling interleukin-6 expression — affects inflammation, exercise recovery, and cardiovascular risk
Details
- Gene
- IL6
- Chromosome
- 7
- Risk allele
- G
- Consequence
- Regulatory
- Inheritance
- Codominant
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Strong
- Chip coverage
- v3 v4 v5
Population Frequency
Ancestry Frequencies
Category
Fitness & BodyInterleukin-6: The Exercise Cytokine With a Double Edge
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is one of the most versatile signalling molecules in the human
body. Produced by immune cells, fat tissue, and — critically — by working skeletal
muscle, it acts as both a pro-inflammatory cytokine11 pro-inflammatory cytokine
a signalling protein that
promotes inflammation as part of the immune response and an anti-inflammatory
myokine22 myokine
a cytokine released by muscle fibres during contraction, with systemic
metabolic effects. The -174G/C promoter variant (rs1800795) sits 174 base pairs
upstream of the IL6 gene on chromosome 7 and directly controls how much IL-6 your
cells produce.
The Mechanism
The G allele at position -174 creates a promoter sequence with higher
transcriptional activity33 transcriptional activity
the rate at which a gene is read and converted into
mRNA, which then becomes protein. In reporter gene assays, the G allele drives
roughly 2-fold higher IL6 transcription compared to the C allele. This difference
is mediated by a binding site for the transcription factor
NF-144 NF-1
Nuclear Factor 1, a transcription factor that represses IL6 expression
when bound to the -174C sequence: the C allele creates this repressive binding
site, while the G allele abolishes it, allowing uninhibited transcription.
The consequence is straightforward: GG homozygotes produce the most IL-6 at baseline
and under stress, CG heterozygotes produce intermediate amounts, and CC homozygotes
produce the least. After stimulation by
LPS55 LPS
lipopolysaccharide, a bacterial endotoxin that triggers immune activation
or IL-1, the G allele construct shows a robust increase in expression while the
C allele construct remains largely unresponsive.
The Evidence
The -174G/C variant is one of the most studied cytokine polymorphisms, with evidence spanning cardiovascular disease, diabetes, exercise physiology, and ageing.
Cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis of 74 studies with 86,229 subjects66 meta-analysis of 74 studies with 86,229 subjects
Rodriguez-Perez et al. Interleukin 6 (rs1800795) gene polymorphism is associated
with cardiovascular diseases. EXCLI Journal, 2019
found the C allele associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk
(dominant model OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18). The association was strongest for
coronary artery disease (homozygous OR 1.50) and in Chinese populations
(allelic OR 1.36).
Exercise-induced muscle damage: Yamin et al.77 Yamin et al.
IL6 (-174) and TNFA (-308)
promoter polymorphisms are associated with systemic creatine kinase response to
eccentric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2008
demonstrated that CC homozygotes had a greater than 3-fold increased risk of
massive creatine kinase88 creatine kinase
an enzyme released from damaged muscle fibres; elevated
CK after exercise is a marker of muscle damage (CK) response following
eccentric exercise. Paradoxically, despite producing less IL-6 at baseline, the
CC genotype appears to mount a more exaggerated muscle damage response.
Power athlete association: Ruiz et al.99 Ruiz et al.
The -174 G/C polymorphism of the IL6
gene is associated with elite power performance. J Sci Med Sport,
2010 found the GG genotype
overrepresented among elite power athletes (sprinters, jumpers, throwers) with
an OR of 2.47 compared to controls, suggesting the higher inflammatory response
may benefit explosive performance.
Diabetes: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 42,150 participants1010 comprehensive meta-analysis of 42,150 participants
IL-6 gene rs1800795 polymorphism and diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr,
2022 found the G allele associated
with decreased type 2 diabetes risk in some populations, while the C allele
showed a protective effect against fasting hyperglycaemia.
Glucose metabolism: A joint analysis of 17 studies1111 joint analysis of 17 studies
Huth et al. Joint analysis
of individual participants' data from 17 studies on the association of the IL6
variant -174G>C. Ann Med, 2009
found C-allele carriers had significantly lower fasting glucose
(-0.091 mmol/L, P=0.014).
Practical Implications
The functional consequence of this variant — higher or lower IL-6 production — has different implications depending on context:
For exercise recovery, GG carriers mount a stronger inflammatory response to training, which may support adaptation for power sports but also means managing recovery is important. CC carriers, despite lower baseline IL-6, show elevated muscle damage markers after eccentric exercise and may need longer recovery between intense sessions.
For cardiovascular health, the C allele carries modestly increased risk, making anti-inflammatory lifestyle measures and regular monitoring more relevant for CC and CG individuals.
For metabolic health, the C allele is associated with slightly lower fasting glucose, offering a minor metabolic advantage, while the G allele may carry a modest type 2 diabetes risk in certain populations.
Anti-inflammatory strategies — omega-3 fatty acids, adequate sleep, managing chronic stress, and maintaining a diet rich in colourful vegetables and polyphenols — are beneficial for all genotypes but especially important for GG carriers with higher baseline inflammation.
Interactions
The -174G/C variant (rs1800795) is in strong linkage disequilibrium with rs1800797 (-597G/A) in the same IL6 promoter region (r-squared = 0.92), meaning these two variants are almost always inherited together. The nearby rs1800796 (-572G/C) variant is an independent functional polymorphism that can compound the effect on IL-6 levels, though it is primarily polymorphic in East Asian populations. IL-6 signalling also interacts with the broader inflammatory cascade — TNF-alpha and CRP levels are influenced by IL-6, so this variant has downstream effects on systemic inflammation markers.
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Intermediate IL-6 production — balanced inflammatory profile
Heterozygotes produce intermediate levels of IL-6, as one chromosome carries the high-expression G promoter and the other carries the low-expression C promoter. Functional studies show CG individuals have plasma IL-6 levels between those of GG and CC homozygotes.
From a disease risk perspective, the CG genotype carries a modest intermediate cardiovascular risk. The large meta-analysis by Rodriguez-Perez et al. (2019) found a heterozygous OR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.21) for CVD. For exercise response, CG carriers typically show moderate creatine kinase elevations after eccentric exercise.
Lower baseline IL-6 production with slower exercise recovery
The CC genotype abolishes the high-expression promoter haplotype of IL6. Reporter gene studies show the -174C allele creates a binding site for the repressive transcription factor NF-1, reducing transcription. After LPS or IL-1 stimulation, the C allele construct shows minimal response compared to the G allele.
In a study of eccentric exercise, CC homozygotes had a greater than 3-fold risk of a massive creatine kinase response (Yamin et al. 2008, PMID 18758806). A 2024 knock-in mouse study (Sherlock et al., PMID 39665197) confirmed that CC-equivalent mice produced greater IL-6 spikes and altered mitochondrial gene expression after treadmill running, suggesting a compensatory overshoot mechanism.
From a cardiovascular perspective, meta-analyses (Rodriguez-Perez et al. 2019, 86,229 subjects) found the C allele modestly increases CVD risk (dominant OR 1.12). This may relate to the less effective acute inflammatory resolution in C-allele carriers.
Highest IL-6 production — strong inflammatory responder with power advantage
The GG genotype provides maximal IL6 promoter activity. Without the NF-1 repressor binding site created by the C allele, both chromosomes drive high transcription. This results in higher baseline plasma IL-6 and a more robust IL-6 surge in response to exercise, infection, or stress.
Ruiz et al. (2010, PMID 19853505) found the GG genotype was significantly overrepresented among elite Spanish power athletes (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.24-4.92), suggesting the stronger inflammatory signalling supports explosive performance adaptation. However, this association was not replicated in all populations, indicating the effect is polygenic and context-dependent.
From a metabolic perspective, the GG genotype may carry modest type 2 diabetes risk through chronically elevated IL-6 promoting insulin resistance. Regular exercise effectively lowers chronic IL-6 levels, making physical activity doubly important for GG carriers.
Key References
Fishman et al. review in JCI — establishes IL6 -174G/C as a functional promoter variant and Mendelian randomization instrument for IL-6 research
Rodriguez-Perez et al. — meta-analysis of 74 studies (86,229 subjects) confirming rs1800795 association with cardiovascular disease
Comprehensive meta-analysis of 42,150 participants examining rs1800795 association with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
Yamin et al. — IL6 -174 CC genotype associated with 3-fold increased risk of massive CK response to eccentric exercise
Ruiz et al. — GG genotype overrepresented in elite power athletes (OR 2.47 vs controls)
Baumert et al. — review of genetic variation in exercise-induced muscle damage, highlighting IL6 as a key susceptibility gene
Huth et al. — joint analysis of 17 studies finding C-allele carriers have lower fasting glucose (-0.09 mmol/L)
Sherlock et al. 2024 — knock-in mouse model showing CC genotype produces greater IL-6 and mitochondrial gene response to exercise