rs2536 — MTOR
3'UTR variant that alters miR-150 binding affinity; the C allele increases microRNA-mediated suppression of MTOR expression and is associated with improved cancer prognosis and reduced mTOR pathway activity
Details
- Gene
- MTOR
- Chromosome
- 1
- Risk allele
- T
- Consequence
- Regulatory
- Inheritance
- Codominant
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Moderate
- Chip coverage
- v3 v4 v5
Population Frequency
Ancestry Frequencies
Related SNPs
Category
Longevity & AgingSee your personal result for MTOR
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
MTOR rs2536 — The miRNA Switch in the Longevity Pathway
The mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) protein is the central command node for one of the most consequential decisions cells make: whether to grow or to clean house. When nutrients and growth signals are abundant, mTOR drives protein synthesis and cell proliferation. When mTOR is suppressed — by fasting, caloric restriction, or rapamycin — cells shift toward autophagy and stress resistance, the cellular programs most closely tied to longevity across every organism where this has been tested. rs2536 is a variant in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of the MTOR gene that adjusts this setting through a post-transcriptional mechanism distinct from the promoter variant rs2295080.
The two MTOR variants in the GeneOps database regulate mTOR expression through different molecular mechanisms but converge on the same biology: lower mTOR activity means more autophagy, better protein quality control, and — based on the cancer and survival data — measurably better outcomes in contexts where mTOR overactivity drives disease.
The Mechanism
rs2536 sits in the 3' untranslated region of the MTOR gene — the portion of the mRNA that comes after the stop codon and is never translated into protein. The 3'UTR is not silent: it is the primary docking site for microRNAs (miRNAs), short RNA molecules that bind to the 3'UTR and suppress gene expression by either blocking translation or triggering mRNA degradation.
The rs2536 T>C substitution alters a binding site for microRNA-150 (miR-150)11 microRNA-150 (miR-150)
a miRNA expressed broadly in immune, vascular, and epithelial tissues that normally suppresses several growth-promoting genes. The C allele creates a higher-affinity miR-150 binding site compared to the T allele. When miR-150 binds more strongly, it more efficiently suppresses MTOR mRNA translation — meaning C-allele carriers have lower MTOR protein levels in their tissues.
Direct expression analysis confirmed this22 Direct expression analysis confirmed this
Functional variant of MTOR rs2536 and survival of Chinese gastric cancer patients. Int J Cancer, 2019: in 144 patients' adjacent normal gastric tissue samples, MTOR mRNA expression was measurably lower in TC/CC carriers than in TT homozygotes (p=0.043). This is the same functional gradient — TT > TC > CC in MTOR expression — seen with the rs2295080 promoter variant, achieved through a completely different molecular lever.
The Evidence
Cancer prognosis: The most functionally informative study examined 1,002 Chinese gastric cancer patients. The rs2536 C allele was independently associated with a 26% reduction in death risk33 The rs2536 C allele was independently associated with a 26% reduction in death risk
Functional variant of MTOR rs2536 and survival of Chinese gastric cancer patients. Int J Cancer, 2019 (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.96, p=0.022). This survival benefit persisted after adjusting for tumor stage, age, and treatment. Functional follow-up showed that lower mTOR expression in TC/CC carriers correlated with reduced cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro.
Cancer susceptibility: Results are mixed and cancer-type-dependent. In a prostate cancer study of 1,004 Eastern Chinese cases and 1,051 controls, TC/CC genotypes were associated with increased prostate cancer risk44 TC/CC genotypes were associated with increased prostate cancer risk
Polymorphisms in the mTOR gene and risk of sporadic prostate cancer in an Eastern Chinese population. PLOS One, 2013 (dominant model OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13–1.78, p=0.003). In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the direction reversed: the TC genotype was associated with a significantly decreased leukemia risk (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.96), with stronger protection in T-phenotype ALL (OR 0.29 for TC/CC combined). The opposing directions by cancer type mirror the same paradox seen with rs2295080 and leukemia — mTOR biology in hematological malignancies appears distinct from solid tumors.
Meta-analysis: A comprehensive pooled analysis of 18 Chinese studies (6,653 cases, 7,025 controls) found no significant overall association across all cancer types, but within the population-based control subgroup (3,252 cases, 3,368 controls), rs2536 showed a significant association in the dominant model (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01–1.42, p=0.038) and allele model (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.32, p=0.012). The overall null result reflects heterogeneity across cancer types rather than true absence of effect.
The evidence base is almost entirely from Chinese populations. European and other ancestry data are sparse, warranting the moderate evidence rating.
Practical Actions
The actionable implications of rs2536 overlap substantially with those of rs2295080, since both variants regulate mTOR expression in the same direction. TT homozygotes have the highest mTOR expression of the three genotypes and benefit most from deliberate behavioral mTOR suppression: extended overnight fasting, periodic protein restriction, and regular endurance exercise (which activates AMPK, the natural antagonist of mTOR). TC carriers have intermediate mTOR activity and similar but lower-urgency considerations. CC carriers have the lowest mTOR expression and enjoy the most favorable cancer prognosis signal, though they may need to be deliberate about maintaining adequate protein intake to support muscle mass, since mTOR also drives anabolic signaling.
Regardless of genotype, mTOR activity is suppressed by: fasting (the most potent lever), leucine restriction, and exercise-induced AMPK activation. It is stimulated by: dietary protein (especially whey and BCAAs), insulin, and IGF-1. The rs2536 genotype tells you how aggressively you need to apply these tools given your constitutive mTOR expression level.
Interactions
rs2536 and rs2295080 are independent MTOR variants that regulate mTOR expression through different mechanisms (3'UTR miRNA binding vs. promoter transcription factor binding). Carriers of the protective allele at both sites (rs2536 C and rs2295080 G) would be expected to have the lowest overall MTOR expression. Neither variant has been studied in combination in a single cohort, but the additive biology is straightforward — both attenuate the same protein.
The broader PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling axis involves upstream variants in PTEN, AKT1, and TSC1/TSC2 that modulate how strongly growth signals activate mTOR. Downstream, FOXO3 (rs2802292) operates in the same longevity network: AKT phosphorylates and inactivates FOXO3, so lower mTOR activity in rs2536 C carriers means less AKT-driven FOXO3 suppression, complementing the longevity biology of the FOXO3 G-allele.
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Common wild-type genotype — no reduction in miR-150-mediated mTOR suppression
The TT genotype at rs2536 means your MTOR mRNA is not subject to the enhanced miR-150 suppression that C-allele carriers experience. Your mTOR expression is regulated by the same transcription factors and other regulatory inputs that all people share — but without the C-allele's post-transcriptional brake.
This is relevant because chronic mTOR overactivity is mechanistically linked to the cellular hallmarks of aging: impaired autophagy, accumulation of damaged proteins and organelles, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chronic inflammation. The TT genotype at rs2536 is not pathogenic — it is the ancestral common state — but it represents the highest-expression end of the spectrum at this locus, which makes behavioral mTOR suppression strategies especially worth implementing consistently.
Two C alleles maximally enhance miR-150 binding — lowest MTOR expression and strongest cancer prognosis signal
CC homozygotes at rs2536 have the maximum genetically-encoded reduction in MTOR expression at this 3'UTR locus. Both alleles carry the high-affinity miR-150 binding site, meaning microRNA-150 can suppress MTOR translation from both mRNA copies simultaneously — a stronger post-transcriptional brake than TC heterozygotes experience.
The practical consequence is that your cells are constitutively operating with lower mTOR activity, which creates a cellular environment more conducive to autophagy and protein quality control. This is mechanistically similar to the pharmacological effect of low-dose rapamycin, which has extended healthy lifespan in mice even when started late in life.
One important nuance: mTOR also drives muscle protein synthesis via mTORC1-S6K1 signaling. CC carriers with naturally lower mTOR activity may find their anabolic response to dietary protein and resistance training slightly blunted. This argues for paying attention to adequate leucine-rich protein intake (especially post-exercise) to ensure muscle maintenance, particularly with aging. The lower mTOR is beneficial for longevity biology but requires deliberate attention to protein adequacy.
The caveat regarding leukemia risk seen in some datasets for higher-expressing genotypes does not apply here — the ALL data shows TC/CC are actually protected, consistent with the complex, cancer-type-specific nature of mTOR biology in hematological malignancies.
One C allele partially increases miR-150 binding — intermediate mTOR expression with partial protective effect
The heterozygous TC genotype gives you one copy of the C allele's enhanced miR-150 binding site. MicroRNA-150 binds this site and reduces MTOR mRNA translation, but with only one C allele, the suppression is partial compared to CC homozygotes. Direct tissue expression studies confirm the gradient: MTOR levels run TT > TC > CC.
The intermediate position means TC carriers benefit from the C-allele's protective mTOR suppression to a partial degree. From a practical standpoint, TC carriers are positioned between TT (full behavioral mTOR management needed) and CC (naturally lowest mTOR, most attention to protein adequacy). Consistent overnight fasting and periodic protein cycling add meaningful behavioral mTOR suppression on top of the partial C-allele attenuation.
Key References
Gastric cancer survival study (1,002 Chinese patients) — rs2536 C allele independently associated with 26% reduced death risk (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.96, p=0.022); MTOR mRNA expression lower in TC/CC carriers vs TT (p=0.043)
Prostate cancer case-control (1,004 cases, 1,051 controls, Eastern China) — TC/CC genotypes associated with increased prostate cancer risk (dominant model OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13–1.78, p=0.003)
Childhood ALL case-control in China — TC genotype associated with significantly decreased leukemia risk (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.96); stronger protection in T-phenotype ALL (OR 0.29)
Meta-analysis of 18 Chinese studies (6,653 cases, 7,025 controls) — rs2536 shows significant association in population-based control subgroup: allele OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.04–1.32, p=0.012); overall effect modest and cancer-type-dependent
Breast cancer case-control (560 cases, 583 controls, northwest China) — no significant association between rs2536 and breast cancer risk; C allele frequency ~8.7% in controls
Pediatric epilepsy study (480 cases, 503 controls) — rs2536 G/C allele frequency higher in epilepsy cases (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01–1.79, p=0.042)