rs6837293 — PRKG2
Intronic variant in PRKG2 (cGMP-dependent protein kinase II); the T allele was associated with gout susceptibility in a recessive model in a Taiwanese population, proposed to amplify joint inflammation via cGKII-driven macrophage M1 polarization, though a Japanese replication study found no association
Details
- Gene
- PRKG2
- Chromosome
- 4
- Risk allele
- T
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Emerging
Population Frequency
Category
Uric Acid & Kidney FunctionSee your personal result for PRKG2
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
PRKG2 rs6837293 — A Tentative Gout-Susceptibility Signal in a Key Inflammatory Kinase
When a gout attack strikes, the pain is driven not just by uric acid crystals lodging
in a joint — it's driven by the inflammatory cascade those crystals ignite. PRKG2
encodes cGMP-dependent protein kinase II (cGKII)11 cGMP-dependent protein kinase II (cGKII)
a serine/threonine kinase activated
by cyclic GMP, expressed in intestinal epithelium, kidney, cartilage, and immune
cells, a signaling enzyme that turns out
to sit at a key amplification point in this cascade. The intronic variant rs6837293
was identified as a possible gout-susceptibility locus in a Taiwanese genome-wide
analysis — but replication has been elusive, leaving its clinical significance unsettled.
The Mechanism
cGKII phosphorylates the CFTR chloride channel in intestinal epithelium, regulates
renin secretion in the kidney, and supports endochondral bone growth — but its
most relevant role for gout is in immune cells.
A 2015 study by Zhou et al.22 A 2015 study by Zhou et al.
Zhou et al. Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase II is
necessary for macrophage M1 polarization and phagocytosis via toll-like receptor 2.
J Mol Med, 2015
demonstrated that cGKII expression is high in M1-polarized macrophages (the
pro-inflammatory phenotype) but low in M2 (anti-inflammatory) macrophages. When
scientists silenced cGKII, M1 activation was significantly reduced. Critically, when
macrophages were exposed to monosodium urate (MSU) crystals — the trigger of gout
attacks — cGKII and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) expression both increased, amplifying
M1 polarization and phagocytic activity. Knocking down cGKII blunted the MSU-induced
inflammatory response.
This positions PRKG2 as an inflammation amplifier in gout: variants that alter cGKII expression or activity could modulate how intensely the innate immune system responds to urate crystals. The intronic location of rs6837293 suggests a regulatory rather than coding mechanism — potentially affecting PRKG2 expression levels in relevant tissues.
The Evidence
Initial discovery — Taiwanese population:
Chang et al. 200933 Chang et al. 2009
Chang SJ et al. The cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase II gene
associates with gout disease: identified by genome-wide analysis and case-control study.
Ann Rheum Dis, 2009
identified PRKG2 through a genome-wide analysis in 8 gout patients and 10 unaffected
relatives, then validated in a case-control study of 74 male gout patients and 74
age-matched healthy controls from a Taiwanese population. Both rs6837293 and rs7688672
showed significant association with gout under a recessive model (rs6837293 OR = 2.72,
95% CI 1.13–6.54; rs7688672 OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.19–7.02), and the association
remained after adjusting for serum uric acid levels — suggesting that PRKG2 may
influence gout risk through the inflammatory response to crystals rather than through
urate concentration alone.
Replication failure — Japanese population:
Sakiyama et al. 201444 Sakiyama et al. 2014
Sakiyama M et al. Common variants of cGKII/PRKG2 are not
associated with gout susceptibility. J Rheumatol, 2014
attempted replication in a substantially larger Japanese cohort: 741 male gout patients
and 1,302 controls. All four PRKG2 variants — including rs6837293 — showed no
association with gout in any genetic model (allele frequency, dominant, or recessive).
The authors concluded that cGKII is not involved in gout susceptibility.
Mixed results — Chinese cohort:
Guo et al. 201555 Guo et al. 2015
Guo M et al. Polymorphism of rs7688672 and rs10033237 in cGKII/PRKG2
and gout susceptibility of Han population in northern China. Gene, 2015
tested different PRKG2 variants in 405 gout cases and 429 controls (Han Chinese), finding
rs10033237 associated with gout but rs7688672 not — further highlighting the
inconsistency of PRKG2 findings across populations and variant sets.
Taken together, the evidence for rs6837293 is emerging at best. The original
study was small (74 cases), and the larger replication failed. The biological
mechanism — cGKII amplifying urate crystal inflammation — is plausible and
supported by in vitro data, but the specific role of this intronic variant remains
unestablished.
Practical Actions
For TT homozygotes, the empirical gout-susceptibility signal (even if fragile) points toward the inflammatory arm of gout rather than the urate-production arm. This means standard urate-lowering dietary measures are still relevant but may need to be paired with attention to foods and supplements that modulate innate immune activation.
Limiting dietary purines (organ meats, shellfish, red meat, alcohol — especially beer and spirits) reduces urate substrate and therefore crystal formation risk regardless of PRKG2 genotype. If cGKII does amplify the inflammatory response to existing crystals, maintaining serum urate well below the crystallisation threshold of 6.8 mg/dL becomes more important for TT carriers than for CC carriers.
Serum uric acid monitoring is the most actionable next step — a fasting uric acid test can stratify actual hyperuricemia risk, which is the prerequisite for crystal formation regardless of downstream inflammatory gene variants.
Interactions
With SLC2A9 rs3733591 and ABCG2 rs2231142: SLC2A9 and ABCG2 are the strongest determinants of serum urate concentration (explaining ~5% of variance each). PRKG2, if genuinely involved in gout susceptibility, would represent a downstream effector operating after crystal formation — meaning the combination of high-urate genotypes (SLC2A9 C/C, ABCG2 T/T) plus the proposed PRKG2 rs6837293 TT genotype might confer both elevated crystal burden and an amplified inflammatory response, though no study has examined this combination directly.
With rs7688672 (PRKG2): The original Taiwanese study found both rs6837293 and rs7688672 associated with gout under a recessive model. These two intronic PRKG2 variants may be in linkage disequilibrium and tag the same underlying functional signal. Carriers of TT at both loci may represent the subgroup with the most consistent PRKG2-related risk signal.
Nutrient Interactions
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Common PRKG2 genotype — no elevated gout susceptibility from this variant
You carry two copies of the reference C allele at rs6837293, the most common genotype globally (approximately 59% of people across all ancestries). In the Taiwanese discovery study, this was the low-risk genotype for gout under a recessive model. The Japanese replication study found no PRKG2-gout association at all, so this result should be interpreted conservatively.
Your gout risk from this particular variant is not elevated. If you have concerns about gout or hyperuricemia, they are better addressed by examining the major urate-concentration loci (SLC2A9, ABCG2) and your overall diet and metabolic health.
TT homozygote — the genotype associated with gout susceptibility in the original discovery study
Under the recessive model proposed by Chang et al. 2009, TT homozygotes at rs6837293 carry an odds ratio of 2.72 (95% CI 1.13–6.54) for gout relative to CC/CT carriers. The effect was independent of serum uric acid in the Taiwanese cohort, suggesting a downstream inflammatory mechanism rather than elevated urate production. cGKII drives M1 macrophage polarization through TLR2 upregulation, and monosodium urate crystal exposure in vitro induces cGKII and TLR2 co-expression with increased phagocytic activity (Zhou et al. 2015, PMID 25475742).
For TT carriers, the implication is that even modest crystal formation could provoke a more intense inflammatory response than in CC homozygotes. This makes prevention of crystal formation — by keeping serum urate below 6.8 mg/dL — more strategically important than for other genotypes. It also means that if gout attacks do occur, they may be more severe or more prolonged, and prompt management is warranted.
One T allele — likely no elevated risk under recessive model, but genotype monitoring is reasonable
You carry one copy of each allele at rs6837293. In the original Taiwanese study, the risk model was recessive — meaning only TT homozygotes were considered at elevated risk. Heterozygous CT individuals were classified similarly to CC in that model. Approximately 36% of people globally carry this genotype, and CT is moderately common across most ancestries.
The replication evidence for PRKG2 is inconsistent, so CT genotype should not cause undue concern. Standard attention to serum uric acid and dietary purine intake is appropriate regardless of PRKG2 genotype.