Research

rs10767664 — BDNF

Obesity GWAS locus in a conserved BDNF enhancer - reduces hypothalamic BDNF expression and satiety signaling, increasing caloric intake and BMI

Strong Risk Factor Share

Details

Gene
BDNF
Chromosome
11
Risk allele
A
Consequence
Regulatory
Inheritance
Additive
Clinical
Risk Factor
Evidence
Strong
Chip coverage
v3 v4 v5

Population Frequency

AA
63%
AT
32%
TT
5%

Ancestry Frequencies

african
93%
latino
84%
european
80%
south_asian
76%
east_asian
56%

See your personal result for BDNF

Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.

Upload your DNA data

Works with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.

BDNF's Second Role — The Appetite Suppressor in Your Hypothalamus

Most people who know about BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) know it as the brain's plasticity hormone — the factor that strengthens memories, supports neuroplasticity, and responds to exercise. That well-known story belongs to rs6265 (Val66Met), a coding variant that affects BDNF secretion in neurons and is covered in the Brain & Mental Health section of this encyclopedia.

This variant — rs10767664 — tells a different story entirely. It sits in intron 3 of the BDNF gene, within a conserved enhancer region called BE5.111 conserved enhancer region called BE5.1
A 494 base pair stretch of DNA that has been preserved across vertebrate evolution for over 360 million years, suggesting a critical biological function. It controls BDNF expression specifically in hypothalamic cells
, and it affects BDNF's role not in learning and memory but in hypothalamic satiety signaling22 hypothalamic satiety signaling
The process by which the hypothalamus receives signals from the body that food intake is sufficient and suppresses appetite. BDNF in the ventromedial hypothalamus is a critical relay in this satiety circuit
. This variant was identified in one of the largest genome-wide association studies of body mass index ever conducted, affecting approximately 250,000 individuals, and the association is among the strongest ever found for obesity.

The Mechanism

BDNF is highly expressed in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH)33 ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH)
The region of the hypothalamus primarily responsible for satiety. Neurons here receive leptin signals and fire to suppress appetite. When BDNF signaling in the VMH is reduced, animals overeat and gain weight
, where it functions as a critical downstream effector of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) pathway44 melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) pathway
MC4R is activated by alpha-MSH, a hormone produced when leptin signals "enough food." MC4R activation upregulates BDNF in the VMH, which then sustains the satiety signal. This is why MC4R and BDNF variants both appear as top obesity GWAS hits — they are in the same molecular pathway
. When you eat and leptin rises, MC4R activation stimulates BDNF expression in VMH neurons55 stimulates BDNF expression in VMH neurons
Xu B et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates energy balance downstream of melanocortin-4 receptor. Nature Neuroscience, 2003
, and that BDNF signal then propagates satiety through TrkB receptors, suppressing further food intake.

The rs10767664 A allele disrupts this process at the source. Research in primary hypothalamic cells shows that the T allele (the protective minor allele) functions as an active enhancer of BDNF promoter 4 — driving BDNF transcription in response to neuronal signals. The A allele, which is actually the more common version, fails to enhance promoter activity. The result: reduced BDNF expression in the hypothalamus, weaker satiety signaling after meals, and a sustained drive to keep eating.

Recent research further refined this picture by showing that astrocytes in the VMH66 astrocytes in the VMH
Non-neuronal support cells that regulate synaptic communication. VMH astrocytes express TrkB.T1 (a truncated BDNF receptor) and use BDNF signaling to modulate neuronal activity in response to energy state
also require intact BDNF/TrkB signaling77 require intact BDNF/TrkB signaling
Ameroso et al. Astrocytic BDNF signaling within the ventromedial hypothalamus regulates energy homeostasis. Nature Metabolism, 2022
for normal energy homeostasis. Mice lacking TrkB.T1 in VMH astrocytes develop increased body weight, leptin resistance, and impaired glucose tolerance — a metabolic syndrome profile strikingly similar to what rs10767664 A homozygotes are at risk for.

The Evidence

The GIANT consortium meta-analysis88 GIANT consortium meta-analysis
Speliotes EK et al. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nature Genetics, 2010
of 249,796 individuals identified the BDNF locus as one of 18 new BMI- associated signals, with rs10767664 reaching p = 5 × 10⁻²⁶ — far beyond the genome-wide significance threshold. Each copy of the A allele increases BMI by an estimated 0.19 kg/m² (95% CI 0.13–0.25), placing the BDNF locus among the strongest obesity GWAS hits identified. The effect was confirmed in a diverse-ancestry replication cohort.

Human feeding data confirms the mechanistic prediction. In the Look AHEAD Trial99 Look AHEAD Trial
A large NIH-funded trial studying lifestyle intervention for overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, n=5,145
, carriers of the AA genotype consumed over 100 kcal per day more1010 carriers of the AA genotype consumed over 100 kcal per day more
McCaffery et al. Obesity susceptibility loci and dietary intake in the Look AHEAD Trial. Am J Clin Nutr, 2012
than carriers of the T allele (p = 0.006), and this effect persisted after adjusting for body weight — confirming it reflects an appetite difference, not just a consequence of greater body mass.

The metabolic consequences extend beyond weight. In a prospective study of 507 obese Caucasian women, T allele carriers faced 1.33-fold higher odds of type 2 diabetes1111 T allele carriers faced 1.33-fold higher odds of type 2 diabetes
de Luis DA et al. rs10767664 gene variant in BDNF is associated with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Caucasian females with obesity. Ann Nutr Metab, 2017
(95% CI 1.17–2.08) compared to non-carriers, with higher BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, insulin, and CRP in the T-carrier diabetic subgroup. A separate intervention study in 80 obese patients on a calorie-restricted diet found AA homozygotes lost significantly more weight1212 AA homozygotes lost significantly more weight
de Luis DA et al. RS 10767664 gene variant in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) affect metabolic changes and insulin resistance after a standard hypocaloric diet. J Diabetes Complications, 2018
(3.4 vs 1.7 kg, p=0.01) with better fat mass reduction, triglyceride improvement, and insulin sensitivity gains than T carriers, suggesting T allele carriers may have a complex metabolic phenotype with worse insulin resistance independent of current weight.

Practical Implications

The A risk allele is very common — roughly 63% of people of European descent are AA homozygotes and another 32% are AT heterozygotes. Carrying the risk allele does not mean inevitable obesity; it means your hypothalamic satiety brake at this locus is less powerful than in the uncommon TT genotype. The 100 kcal/day difference in intake observed in the Look AHEAD trial is modest in isolation, but accumulated over months and years — and compounded with other obesity-risk loci — it represents a genuine appetite disadvantage worth counteracting proactively.

The most genotype-specific intervention follows directly from the mechanism: strategies that enhance post-meal satiety signaling (protein-first eating, high-fiber meal starters, time-structured eating) can compensate for reduced hypothalamic BDNF tone. For AA and AT carriers with metabolic concerns, monitoring fasting insulin and HOMA-IR provides an early warning signal for insulin resistance that this genotype predisposes to.

Interactions

rs10767664 and MC4R (rs17782313) are in the same satiety signaling cascade. BDNF is a downstream effector of MC4R in the VMH, meaning both proteins must function for full satiety signal propagation. A carrier of both the MC4R risk allele (rs17782313 C) and the BDNF obesity allele (rs10767664 A) has impairment at two consecutive steps in the same hypothalamic circuit, creating a compounded appetite dysregulation greater than either variant alone. Specific interaction studies at the genotype level have not been published, but the shared mechanistic pathway provides a strong biological rationale.

FTO (rs9939609) and rs10767664 operate through independent mechanisms — FTO primarily affects thermogenesis and adipogenesis through IRX3/IRX5 in brown fat and hypothalamus, while rs10767664 acts on VMH satiety signaling via the BDNF-TrkB pathway. Their BMI effects are additive rather than synergistic. Large-scale polygenic risk score analyses confirm that carrying risk alleles at both loci produces meaningfully higher obesity risk than either alone.

This variant is distinct from rs6265 (BDNF Val66Met), which is catalogued in the Brain & Mental Health section. rs6265 is a missense variant in the BDNF coding sequence that impairs activity-dependent BDNF secretion from neurons, affecting memory and neuroplasticity. rs10767664 is a regulatory variant that reduces BDNF expression in the hypothalamus, affecting satiety signaling and energy balance. The two variants show weak linkage disequilibrium and can be inherited independently — a person may carry one, both, or neither risk allele.

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant:

TT “Full Hypothalamic BDNF Drive” Normal

No risk alleles — full BDNF enhancer activity in the hypothalamus

You carry two copies of the protective T allele at rs10767664. This is the uncommon genotype — only about 4-5% of people of European descent share it, rising to about 19% in East Asian populations. Your BDNF enhancer region BE5.1 is fully active in hypothalamic cells, driving stronger BDNF expression in the ventromedial hypothalamus and supporting robust satiety signaling.

Population feeding studies show TT carriers consume over 100 kcal per day less than AA homozygotes, independent of body weight — your hypothalamic satiety brake is functioning at the most effective level for this locus.

AT “Intermediate Satiety Drive” Intermediate Caution

One risk allele — mildly reduced hypothalamic satiety signaling

In heterozygotes, one copy of the BDNF enhancer region BE5.1 carries the T allele (active enhancer) and one carries the A allele (inactive). The result is partial — but not absent — enhancer activity driving BDNF promoter 4 in hypothalamic cells. This produces intermediate BDNF expression in the ventromedial hypothalamus compared to TT (full enhancer activity) and AA (no enhancer activity).

Importantly, T allele carriers of any type (AT or TT) show worse insulin sensitivity response in some studies of obese patients, suggesting the T allele's protective effect on BMI may not fully translate to metabolic protection in the context of existing obesity. This nuance is relevant for AT carriers managing metabolic risk rather than weight alone.

AA “Reduced Hypothalamic BDNF” High Risk Caution

Two copies of the obesity risk allele — reduced satiety signaling

The AA genotype at rs10767664 places both copies of the BDNF enhancer region BE5.1 in its non-functional form. The T allele normally drives BDNF promoter 4 activity in hypothalamic cells; the A allele does not. With no copy of the enhancer-active T allele, BDNF expression in the ventromedial hypothalamus is reduced, weakening the MC4R→BDNF→TrkB satiety cascade.

The practical consequence is not uncontrollable hunger but a subtly weaker "stop eating" signal — the brain's appetite brake engages less efficiently. Over days and years, this translates into the caloric excess observed in population studies. The effect is most significant in the context of food environments that offer unlimited caloric density, where a weaker internal stop signal has nowhere to be counteracted by scarcity.

Despite higher caloric intake tendency, AA carriers respond well to dietary interventions: in a controlled hypocaloric diet study, AA homozygotes lost more weight than T carriers, suggesting that when external structure is imposed, the appetite disadvantage is neutralized and metabolic flexibility is preserved.

Key References

PMID: 20935630

Speliotes et al. 2010 — GIANT GWAS of ~250,000 individuals confirming BDNF locus (rs10767664 A allele) associated with BMI, effect 0.19 kg/m² (p=5×10⁻²⁶)

PMID: 12796784

Xu B et al. 2003 — established BDNF as downstream effector of MC4R in VMH; BDNF infusion rescues hyperphagia in MC4R-deficient mice (Nat Neurosci)

PMID: 35501599

Ameroso et al. 2022 — astrocytic BDNF/TrkB.T1 signaling in VMH regulates energy homeostasis; VMH-specific BDNF loss causes hyperphagia and metabolic syndrome (Nature Metabolism)

PMID: 29174117

de Luis et al. 2018 — rs10767664 AA vs T-allele carriers in 80 obese patients on 3-month hypocaloric diet; AA lost significantly more weight (3.4 vs 1.7 kg, p=0.01) with greater fat mass, triglyceride, and HOMA-IR improvement (J Diabetes Complications)

PMID: 28595187

de Luis et al. 2017 — rs10767664 T allele associated with 1.33-fold higher type 2 diabetes risk (95% CI 1.17-2.08) in 507 obese Caucasian women with worse insulin resistance markers in T-carrier diabetic subgroup (Ann Nutr Metab)

PMID: 22513296

McCaffery et al. 2012 — Look AHEAD trial (n=2,075): AA carriers at rs10767664 consumed >100 kcal/d more than T-allele carriers (p=0.006-0.007), effect independent of body weight (Am J Clin Nutr)