rs1175544 — PPARG PPARG rs1175544
Intronic PPARG variant that accounts for ~7% of individual variation in body weight reduction during calorie restriction; the T allele also appears in PPARG haplotypes associated with metabolic and glucose traits across several populations
Details
- Gene
- PPARG
- Chromosome
- 3
- Risk allele
- T
- Clinical
- Risk Factor
- Evidence
- Emerging
Population Frequency
Category
Fat Storage & EnergySee your personal result for PPARG
Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.
Upload your DNA dataWorks with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.
PPARG rs1175544 — Weight Loss Variation in the Master Fat-Cell Regulator
PPARG encodes Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma11 Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma
PPARγ is a nuclear
receptor and transcription factor that acts as the master regulator of adipocyte
differentiation (fat cell formation) and whole-body insulin sensitivity,
the protein that determines how efficiently precursor cells develop into mature
fat cells and how sensitively those cells respond to insulin. It is also the molecular
target of thiazolidinedione22 thiazolidinedione
Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone)
bind and activate PPARγ, improving insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes treatment
drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes. rs1175544 sits in intron 5 of PPARG
(NM_005037.7:c.1181-8353C>T) — it does not alter the PPARγ protein sequence itself
but lies in a regulatory region that may influence transcript abundance or
splicing efficiency in metabolically active tissues.
The Mechanism
As an intronic variant, rs1175544 exerts its effects through regulatory mechanisms
rather than protein-coding changes. Intronic variants in PPARG can alter transcription
factor binding sites, affect local chromatin accessibility, or act as markers in
linkage disequilibrium33 linkage disequilibrium
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) means two variants are inherited
together so frequently that one can serve as a proxy marker for the other's functional
effect with nearby functional variants. rs1175544
sits in a cluster of PPARG intronic SNPs — including the neighboring rs1175543 — that
tag a haplotype block spanning intron 4–5 of the gene. Changes in PPARγ
transcriptional activity in adipose and hepatic tissue affect the rate of adipogenesis,
alter free fatty acid flux, and modulate insulin signaling through effects on GLUT4
translocation and adipokine secretion.
The Evidence
The primary association with weight loss comes from a study by Matsuo et al.44 study by Matsuo et al.
Matsuo T et al. PPARG genotype accounts for part of individual variation in body
weight reduction in response to calorie restriction. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2009,
which genotyped 8 PPARG variants in 95 middle-aged Japanese women (BMI ≥25 kg/m²)
undergoing a structured 14-week calorie restriction intervention (1,200 kcal/day).
Body weight decreased by approximately 7.7 kg (11.3%) on average. Among all SNPs
tested, rs1175544 showed the strongest association with weight reduction (p=0.004),
with the genotype accounting for 7% of total weight loss variance in multiple
regression. Notably, no association was found between these SNPs and changes in
coronary heart disease risk factors — suggesting the variant's metabolic effect is
specific to weight loss response rather than broad cardiovascular risk.
A larger study by Imaizumi et al.55 larger study by Imaizumi et al.
Imaizumi T et al. Effect of dietary energy and
polymorphisms in BRAP and GHRL on obesity and metabolic traits. Obes Res Clin Pract,
2018 included rs1175544 in an 8-SNP
PPARG panel assessed in 5,112 Japanese male workers, examining interactions between
dietary energy intake and metabolic phenotypes. The study's primary significant
results highlighted other genes (BRAP, GHRL), and rs1175544's independent contribution
was not statistically significant in this broader population, suggesting the weight
loss signal may be context-dependent or population-specific.
A secondary observation from Sadarangani et al.66 Sadarangani et al.
Sadarangani SP et al. Vitamin D,
leptin and impact on immune response to seasonal influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in older
persons. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2016
found rs1175544 among three PPARG SNPs significantly associated with baseline
25-(OH)D levels (p=0.03), consistent with established links between PPARγ pathway
activity and vitamin D metabolism.
The overall evidence for rs1175544 specifically remains at the emerging level: the primary weight loss finding comes from a single small study (n=95) in a single population (Japanese women), and the effect has not been replicated in a large independent cohort.
Practical Actions
For CT and TT carriers, the available data suggest that individual response to calorie restriction may diverge from population averages — the genotype accounted for 7% of variance, which is meaningful at the individual level even if modest in absolute terms. Given that PPARG intronic variants in this region form a haplotype block, the actionable strategy is to prioritize structured calorie deficit approaches and monitor actual weight trajectory over 4–8 weeks rather than relying on predicted outcomes from population norms. Consistent dietary energy tracking provides the feedback needed to adjust when individual response deviates from average.
Interactions
rs1175544 belongs to a PPARG intronic haplotype block that also includes rs1175543 and the neighboring rs3856806. These variants are in partial linkage disequilibrium and their combined haplotype context may matter more than any single variant alone. The well-established PPARG Pro12Ala variant (rs1801282) — which directly affects PPARγ protein activity and insulin sensitivity — is in a different region of the gene and likely acts independently of the intronic haplotype tagged by rs1175544. Another intronic PPARG variant, rs17036314, is specifically associated with physical activity modifying T2D conversion risk; its interaction with rs1175544 has not been studied.
Nutrient Interactions
Genotype Interpretations
What each possible genotype means for this variant:
Common genotype — average calorie restriction response
You have the most common rs1175544 genotype (C/C), shared by approximately 56% of people globally. Based on the available evidence, your weight loss response during calorie restriction is likely to track close to population averages. The Matsuo et al. study found that CC carriers did not deviate substantially from the mean response during a structured 14-week calorie restriction program producing ~7.7 kg average weight loss in Japanese women.
One T allele — individual calorie restriction response may vary
You carry one copy of the T allele at rs1175544 (C/T), a genotype found in approximately 38% of people globally. The Matsuo et al. study found that rs1175544 genotype accounted for 7% of variance in body weight reduction during calorie restriction — a meaningful proportion at the individual level. CT carriers may experience weight loss trajectories that diverge from population averages, though whether the T allele tends toward greater or smaller weight loss awaits larger replication studies. This variant is informative for personalizing dietary interventions.
Two T alleles — potentially divergent calorie restriction response
You have two copies of the T allele at rs1175544 (T/T), a genotype found in approximately 6% of people globally and more common in East Asian populations (~17% frequency). The Matsuo et al. study found rs1175544 to be the strongest predictor of individual weight loss variation among all PPARG variants tested, with the genotype accounting for 7% of variance during a 14-week calorie restriction program. Homozygous TT status means your calorie restriction response is most likely to differ from the population mean — the direction of this divergence requires larger replication studies to fully characterize.