rs17782313 — MC4R Near-gene C>T

Intergenic variant 188kb downstream of MC4R affecting appetite regulation, meal size, and obesity risk

See your personal result for MC4R

Upload your DNA data to find out which genotype you carry and what it means for you.

Upload your DNA data

Works with 23andMe, AncestryDNA, and other DNA test exports. Results in under 60 seconds.

The Appetite Control Switch — MC4R and Satiety Signaling

The melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) sits at the heart of your brain's appetite regulation system. Located in the hypothalamus11 hypothalamus
the brain region controlling hunger, satiety, and energy balance, MC4R acts as a critical satiety receptor — when activated by melanocortin hormones, it signals "stop eating" and increases energy expenditure. The rs17782313 variant lies 188 kilobases downstream of the MC4R gene, in a regulatory region22 regulatory region
intergenic DNA that controls gene expression without coding for protein that modulates how much MC4R your neurons produce.

This is the second strongest common obesity genetic signal33 second strongest common obesity genetic signal
after FTO rs9939609, the most well-replicated obesity GWAS hit discovered in genome-wide association studies. Each copy of the C allele increases BMI by approximately 0.22 kg/m², and the effect is even stronger in children. But unlike FTO, which primarily affects thermogenesis44 thermogenesis
heat production and baseline metabolic rate, MC4R variants work through appetite — specifically affecting meal size, food cravings, and the brain's response to satiety signals.

The Mechanism

The rs17782313 polymorphism is a single nucleotide change from T (thymine) to C (cytosine) in an intergenic regulatory element.

The melanocortin pathway works through leptin55 leptin
a hormone produced by fat cells that signals energy stores to the brain. Leptin activates proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons, which produce alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH). This hormone binds to MC4R receptors, triggering satiety and ramping up energy expenditure.

GTEx database analysis66 GTEx database analysis
Genotype-Tissue Expression project data confirms that rs17782313 modulates MC4R expression in brain regions including the basal ganglia, as well as in testis and ovary. The variant also upregulates expression of DNAJC27 (a gene near MC4R), which may contribute to its metabolic effects through mechanisms still being investigated.

The Evidence

The genetic association between rs17782313 and obesity is one of the most robust in human genetics.

Beyond BMI, the variant affects metabolic health. A 2024 systematic review77 2024 systematic review
examining metabolic syndrome components confirmed associations with diabetes (independent of BMI), hypertension, and dyslipidemia. In a Korean cohort, C allele carriers had 1.29-fold higher diabetes risk even after adjusting for body weight, suggesting MC4R influences glucose metabolism through pathways beyond simple adiposity.

The behavioral phenotype is especially striking. C allele carriers consistently show:

  • Higher appetite scores — meta-analysis of 7 studies88 meta-analysis of 7 studies
    8,044 participants total     found C allele associated with increased overall appetite and hunger ratings
  • Elevated ghrelin — Kuwaiti cohort study99 Kuwaiti cohort study showed C carriers had higher plasma ghrelin (the "hunger hormone") compared to TT
  • Emotional eating and binge eating — Chilean study1010 Chilean study found C carriers had higher emotional eating scores and 2.18-fold increased odds of binge eating when depressed (OR=2.18, 95% CI=1.23-3.87)
  • Stress-appetite interaction — Korean Genome Epidemiology Study1111 Korean Genome Epidemiology Study showed C allele only associated with higher BMI in individuals reporting high mental stress, with no effect under low stress

Macronutrient preferences also shift. Studies show C carriers tend toward higher fat and protein intake and lower carbohydrate consumption, though results vary by population and diet assessment method. Critically, MC4R affects meal size, not meal frequency1212 meal size, not meal frequency
signaling within individual eating episodes rather than timing between meals — C carriers eat larger portions when they do eat.

Practical Implications

If you carry one or two copies of the C allele, your brain's satiety system is working with a slightly muted signal. This doesn't mean weight gain is inevitable, but it does mean you're fighting a biological headwind that benefits from strategic management.

The stress-eating connection is actionable. Since the genetic effect only manifests under high mental stress, stress management isn't just psychological self-care — it's metabolic risk reduction. Practices that lower cortisol and activate parasympathetic tone may literally silence the genetic risk.

Behavioral interventions targeting emotional eating and binge patterns show promise. Mindfulness-based interventions1313 Mindfulness-based interventions
systematic reviews of MBIs for obesity-related eating have demonstrated efficacy for reducing binge eating, emotional eating, and external eating — exactly the behavioral phenotypes elevated in C carriers. Teaching interoceptive awareness (recognizing true physiological hunger vs. emotional triggers) may be especially valuable when genetic satiety signals are weakened.

Interactions

FTO rs9939609: The combined effect1414 combined effect
documented in multiple populations is more than additive. In a Chinese Han cohort, individuals carrying neither FTO nor MC4R risk alleles had average BMI 25.9±4.9, those with one risk allele 26.4±5.1, two risk alleles 28.1±5.5, and three or four risk alleles 33.2±6.3 — a clear dose-response. These two loci work through different mechanisms (thermogenesis vs. appetite), so their effects compound. If you have both, prioritize interventions addressing both pathways — structured eating for appetite control plus thermogenic activity like strength training or cold exposure for FTO.

rs12970134 and rs571312: These are additional MC4R-region variants in linkage disequilibrium1515 linkage disequilibrium
genetic correlation where alleles are inherited together with rs17782313. Studies often analyze them as a haplotype. The three SNPs tag the same regulatory block affecting MC4R expression, so their effects overlap rather than add.

Dietary patterns: Mediterranean diet adherence1616 Mediterranean diet adherence
DASH score analysis modulates the genetic risk. In a Spanish cohort, MC4R rs17782313 was only associated with type 2 diabetes in individuals with low Mediterranean diet scores; high adherence neutralized the genetic effect. The protective elements appear to be overall dietary pattern quality rather than specific macronutrients — emphasizing whole foods, fiber, polyphenols, and meal regularity over processed hyperpalatable foods that hijack appetite pathways.

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant.

TT Typical Satiety Response Normal

Normal MC4R expression and appetite regulation

You carry two copies of the more common T allele, associated with typical MC4R receptor expression and standard satiety signaling. About 37% of people of European descent share this genotype. Your hypothalamic melanocortin system responds normally to leptin and other satiety hormones, providing clear "stop eating" signals after appropriate meal sizes. You have baseline appetite regulation without the genetic predisposition toward increased hunger, larger meal sizes, or stress-driven eating seen in C carriers.

CT Moderately Reduced Satiety Intermediate

One copy reduces MC4R expression, increasing appetite and meal size

Behaviorally, CT carriers show intermediate increases in emotional eating and binge eating compared to CC, but still significantly higher than TT. About 50% of morbidly obese women with at least one C allele reported severe binge eating in one study, compared to much lower rates in TT homozygotes.

CC Significantly Reduced Satiety Reduced

Two copies substantially reduce MC4R expression, markedly increasing appetite and obesity risk

Behaviorally, CC carriers show the strongest emotional eating phenotype. In a Chilean cohort, C carriers had 2.18-fold increased odds of binge eating when experiencing depressed mood (OR=2.18, 95% CI=1.23-3.87). Over 50% of morbidly obese women with CC or CT genotypes reported severe binge eating in one study. The stress interaction is pronounced — in the Korean Genome Epidemiology Study, CC carriers under high mental stress had dramatically elevated BMIs, while those under low stress were only modestly affected.

The good news: dietary pattern quality matters enormously. In a Spanish cohort, CC carriers with high Mediterranean diet adherence had no increased diabetes risk, while those with low adherence showed significant genetic effects. Environmental interventions can meaningfully modulate genetic predisposition.