Research

rs366631 — GSTM1 Tag SNP for gene deletion

Tag SNP proxy for GSTM1 gene deletion status — the most common pharmacogenomic variant worldwide, eliminating a Phase II detoxification enzyme that conjugates glutathione to environmental carcinogens

Strong Risk Factor

Details

Gene
GSTM1
Chromosome
1
Risk allele
A
Consequence
Other
Inheritance
Autosomal Recessive
Clinical
Risk Factor
Evidence
Strong
Chip coverage
v3 v4 v5

Population Frequency

AA
50%
AG
38%
GG
12%

Ancestry Frequencies

east_asian
58%
european
53%
latino
46%
south_asian
33%
african
27%

GSTM1 — Your Body's Frontline Defense Against Environmental Toxins

Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 (GSTM1) is a Phase II detoxification enzyme11 Phase II detoxification enzyme
Phase II enzymes conjugate reactive intermediates produced by Phase I (CYP450) enzymes with water-soluble molecules like glutathione, making toxins easier to excrete
that plays a critical role in neutralizing environmental carcinogens, pollutants, and reactive oxygen species. It works by conjugating glutathione22 glutathione
The body's most abundant intracellular antioxidant, a tripeptide of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine
to electrophilic compounds — essentially tagging dangerous molecules for safe elimination from the body.

What makes GSTM1 remarkable among genetic variants is the sheer scale of its most common polymorphism: roughly half of all people of European descent carry a complete deletion of the GSTM1 gene on both chromosomes, resulting in zero enzyme production. This is one of the most prevalent pharmacogenomic variants in the human genome.

The Mechanism

Unlike typical SNPs that change a single DNA base, the GSTM1 "null" variant involves a whole-gene deletion33 whole-gene deletion
A ~20kb segment containing the entire GSTM1 gene is deleted through unequal homologous recombination between flanking GSTM2 and GSTM5 sequences
. The rs366631 variant reported here is not the deletion itself but a tag SNP44 tag SNP
A SNP in linkage disequilibrium with the true variant of interest, used as a proxy when the actual variant is difficult to genotype directly
— a proxy that tracks the deletion status on genotyping arrays like those used by 23andMe. The AA genotype at rs366631 indicates the GSTM1 gene is absent on both chromosomes (GSTM1 null), while AG indicates one functional copy and GG indicates two functional copies.

The study that established this tag SNP relationship55 study that established this tag SNP relationship
Girirajan S et al. Population-specific GSTM1 copy number variation. Hum Mol Genet, 2009
showed that rs366631 is technically a non-polymorphic site — the apparent genotype variation arises because the genotyping probe cross-hybridizes with a homologous sequence in the GSTM1 region. When the gene is deleted, the probe cannot bind, producing a different signal that reliably tracks deletion status.

GSTM1 is particularly important for detoxifying polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)66 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Carcinogenic compounds found in tobacco smoke, charred/grilled foods, diesel exhaust, and air pollution
, aflatoxins77 aflatoxins
Toxic compounds produced by certain molds that contaminate grains, nuts, and spices — potent liver carcinogens
, and reactive oxygen species. Without functional GSTM1, these compounds persist longer in the body and are more likely to form DNA adducts88 DNA adducts
Chemical bonds between carcinogens and DNA that can cause mutations and initiate cancer
.

The Evidence

The health consequences of GSTM1 null status have been studied extensively, with over 1,900 published studies as cataloged in a 2022 worldwide systematic review99 2022 worldwide systematic review
Correia C et al. Worldwide Systematic Review of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Null Genotypes by Continent, Ethnicity, and Therapeutic Area. OMICS, 2022
.

Bladder cancer has the strongest association. A pooled analysis of 17 studies1010 pooled analysis of 17 studies
Engel LS et al. Pooled analysis and meta-analysis of glutathione S-transferase M1 and bladder cancer: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol, 2002
with 2,149 cases and 3,646 controls found GSTM1 null carriers had a 44% increased risk (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.68). An updated meta-analysis1111 updated meta-analysis
Yu C et al. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms are associated with increased bladder cancer risk. Oncotarget, 2016
confirmed this (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.47) and found that individuals null for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 had an even higher risk (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.50-2.26).

Lung cancer risk is also elevated, particularly in combination with smoking or air pollution exposure. A meta-analysis of 53 studies1212 meta-analysis of 53 studies
Wang H et al. The association of GSTM1 deletion polymorphism with lung cancer risk in Chinese population. Sci Rep, 2015
found GSTM1 null carriers had 46% higher lung cancer risk (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.32-1.66). In never-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke for 20+ years, the risk was 2.3-fold higher for GSTM1 null individuals.

Cruciferous vegetables and sulforaphane. The relationship between GSTM1 status and cruciferous vegetable benefit is nuanced. A clinical study by Gasper et al.1313 clinical study by Gasper et al.
Gasper AV et al. Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and metabolism of sulforaphane from standard and high-glucosinolate broccoli. Am J Clin Nutr, 2005
found that GSTM1-null individuals metabolize and excrete sulforaphane more rapidly than GSTM1-positive individuals. Paradoxically, some studies suggest GSTM1-null individuals may derive greater cancer protection from cruciferous vegetables because the isothiocyanates remain bioactive rather than being conjugated and excreted. However, this effect varies by cancer type and population, and GSTM1-null individuals still lack the enzyme's broader detoxification functions.

Practical Implications

GSTM1 null status is not a disease — it is a common genetic variation that shifts your baseline detoxification capacity. The practical response focuses on three areas: reducing toxic exposures, supporting alternative detoxification pathways, and increasing dietary protective factors.

Cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, broccoli sprouts, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, kale, cabbage) are particularly valuable because they contain sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates1414 sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates
Compounds that induce Phase II detoxification enzymes through the Nrf2 pathway, partially compensating for the lost GSTM1 activity
. Broccoli sprouts contain 20-100 times more sulforaphane precursor than mature broccoli. Supporting glutathione levels through N-acetylcysteine (NAC) provides the conjugation substrate that other GST family members (GSTP1, GSTA1) can use to partially compensate for absent GSTM1 activity.

Interactions

The most important interaction is with GSTT1 (glutathione S-transferase Theta 1), another Phase II enzyme with a common whole-gene deletion. Individuals null for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 ("double null") show significantly higher cancer risk than either deletion alone — the bladder cancer meta-analysis found OR 1.84 for double null versus OR 1.36 for GSTM1 null alone. The double null genotype reduces the overall glutathione conjugation capacity more severely because GSTM1 and GSTT1 have partially overlapping but distinct substrate specificities.

GSTM1 also interacts with NAT2 (N-acetyltransferase 2), another Phase II enzyme. Slow NAT2 acetylators who are also GSTM1 null show compounded risk for bladder cancer from aromatic amine exposure (found in tobacco smoke and certain occupational chemicals).

Nutrient Interactions

glutathione increased_need
sulforaphane altered_metabolism

Genotype Interpretations

What each possible genotype means for this variant:

GG “GSTM1 Present (Two Copies)” Normal

Full GSTM1 enzyme activity — two functional gene copies

Having two functional copies of GSTM1 provides maximal enzyme activity for glutathione conjugation. This is the least common genotype globally — most populations have higher frequencies of the deletion allele. The Girirajan et al. (2009) study found that no Caucasian (CEU) samples in HapMap had two copies, while up to 25% of African (YRI) samples did.

Your GSTM1 enzyme effectively processes polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aflatoxins, and other electrophilic compounds. The cancer risk elevations associated with GSTM1 null status do not apply to you.

AG “GSTM1 Carrier (One Copy)” Intermediate Caution

One functional GSTM1 copy — partial enzyme activity

With one functional GSTM1 gene copy, you produce GSTM1 enzyme and maintain the ability to conjugate glutathione to environmental carcinogens and reactive compounds. Studies on gene dosage effects suggest that one copy provides substantial protective function, though some research indicates slightly reduced enzyme activity compared to two-copy individuals.

The cancer risk associations seen in GSTM1 null individuals (OR 1.36-1.46 for various cancers) generally do not apply to heterozygous carriers at the same magnitude, as functional enzyme is still present. However, maintaining good dietary and environmental practices supports your detoxification capacity.

AA “GSTM1 Null” Absent Warning

No functional GSTM1 enzyme — reduced Phase II detoxification capacity

The GSTM1 null genotype (also called GSTM1*0/*0) results from a homozygous whole-gene deletion. With no functional GSTM1 enzyme, your Phase II detoxification relies more heavily on other GST family members (GSTP1, GSTA1, GSTM2) which have overlapping but not identical substrate profiles.

Meta-analyses consistently show modest but significant increases in cancer risk: bladder cancer OR 1.36-1.44, lung cancer OR 1.43-1.46, and gastric cancer OR 1.22 (primarily in Asian populations). These risks are amplified by environmental exposures — smoking, air pollution, and occupational chemical exposure have stronger negative effects in GSTM1 null individuals.

An important nuance: for cruciferous vegetable-derived sulforaphane, GSTM1 null individuals actually metabolize isothiocyanates differently. The Gasper et al. (2005) study showed faster urinary excretion of sulforaphane metabolites in GSTM1 null individuals. Some epidemiological studies suggest this altered metabolism may paradoxically enhance the cancer-protective effects of cruciferous vegetables in GSTM1 null individuals, though this varies by cancer type and study population.

Key References

PMID: 18948376

Girirajan et al. 2009 — identified rs366631 as a pseudo-SNP tag for GSTM1 deletion; demonstrated population-specific copy number variation with >75% deletion in Europeans vs ~25% two-copy in Africans

PMID: 12117698

Engel et al. 2002 — pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 17 studies (2,149 cases, 3,646 controls) confirming GSTM1 null status and bladder cancer risk (summary OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.68)

PMID: 27911277

Yu et al. 2016 — updated meta-analysis confirming GSTM1 null associated with bladder cancer risk (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.47); double null GSTM1/GSTT1 OR 1.84

PMID: 25797617

Wang et al. 2015 — meta-analysis of 53 studies showing GSTM1 deletion associated with lung cancer risk in Chinese population (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.32-1.66)

PMID: 25640380

Saitou & Gokcumen 2015 — worldwide distribution analysis of 81 populations showing GSTM1 null frequency follows latitudinal clines (r=0.28, p<0.05)

PMID: 16332662

Gasper et al. 2005 — GSTM1 polymorphism affects sulforaphane metabolism from broccoli; GSTM1-null individuals excrete isothiocyanate metabolites more rapidly

PMID: 36112350

Correia et al. 2022 — worldwide systematic review of GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype frequencies by continent, ethnicity, and therapeutic area across 1,925 articles

PMID: 30123431

Garte et al. 2018 — meta-prediction of lung cancer susceptibility from GSTM1 deletion and air pollution with smoking status across worldwide populations